Geobotanical distinction using the floristic method: example of the Polish Pomerania

Maria Zając, Adam Zając, Andrzej Łysko, Agnieszka Popiela

Abstract


In the geobotanical division of Poland, Pomerania was treated as a separate subdivision, divided into “coastal plains” and the “Pomeranian uplands” or, in the newest regionalization, the “Pomeranian division”. The goal of this paper is to determine how well the distinctiveness of Pomerania is floristically justified. A total of 1,467 native species occur within the area of Pomerania, representing 57.5% of the native flora of Poland. Fifty-seven species distinguishing Pomerania were selected and their phytogeographic features were discussed and compared to the Polish vascular flora. The distribution of 32 species (56.1%) is characterized as (sub)Atlantic/oceanic. Of the taxa that characterize Pomerania, 47.45% represent the northern element of the Polish flora and 7.01% the western element; species of the eastern element do not exist in Pomerania. The maximum entropy (MaxEnt) method was used for collective distribution analysis of the 57 selected taxa. The analyzes were performed using 41 environmental variables. All the species analyzed are strictly linked to the western and the North Atlantic part of Europe. Statistical evaluation of the MaxEnt model yielded an AUC value of 0.75 for both training and test. The most important environmental variables are minimum high (min_h), temperature annual range (bio07), and mean temperature of driest quarter (bio09). The results of the MaxEnt analysis allowed us also to verify the boundaries of the region and suggest new criteria for them. The southern limit of Pomerania should run along the northern boundary of the terminal moraine belt. Also, the area east of the Vistula does not contain abundant representatives of the flora characteristic for Pomerania. The results of the present study may be used for a broader discussion on the revision of the geobotanical division of Poland, at least in its northern part.

Keywords


bioinformatics; GIS; MaxEnt model; geobotany; species distribution; regionalization; Central Europe

Full Text:

PDF

References


Gilewska S. Rzeźba. In: Starkel L, editor. Geografia Polski. Środowisko przyrodnicze. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN; 1999.

Woś A. Klimat Polski. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN; 1999.

Szafer W. Szata roślinna Polski niżowej. In: Szafer W, Zarzycki K, editors. Szata roślinna Polski. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN; 1977.

Matuszkiewicz JM. Regionalizacja geobotaniczna Polski. Warszawa: Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN; 2008.

Matuszkiewicz JM. Potencjalna roślinność naturalna Polski. Warszawa: Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN; 2008.

Zając M, Zając A. Różnorodność gatunkowa – rośliny naczyniowe i inne. In: Andrzejewski RR, Weigle A, editors. Różnorodność biologiczna Polski. Warszawa: Narodowa Fundacja Ochrony Środowiska; 2003.

Zając A, Zając M, editors. Distribution Atlas of Vascular Plants in Poland – database. Kraków: Laboratory of Computer Chorology, Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University; 2018.

Popiela A, Łysko A, editors. ZARRiG – West Pomeranian Atlas of Plant and Fungi Distribution [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2018 Feb 1]. Available from: http://florafungapomeranica.usz.edu.pl/en/zarrig-eng/

Zając M, Zając A. Western element in the vascular flora of Poland. Biodivers Res Conserv. 2006;1–2:57–63.

Zając M, Zając A. Elementy geograficzne rodzimej flory Polski. The geographical elements of native flora of Poland. Kraków: Nakładem Pracowni Chorologii Komputerowej Instytutu Botaniki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego; 2009.

Zając M, Zając A. Directional northern element in the flora of vascular plants in Poland. Biodivers Res Conserv. 2011;21:19–26. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10119-011-0004-z

Mirek Z, Piękoś-Mirkowa H, Zając A, Zając M, editors. Flowering plants and pteridophytes of Poland – a checklist. Kraków: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences; 2002. (Biodiversity of Poland; vol 1).

Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2018 Jan 9]. Available from: http://www.emplantbase.org/

Matuszkiewicz W. Przewodnik do oznaczania zbiorowisk roślinnych Polski. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN; 2005. (Vademecum Geobotanicum; vol 3).

Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Modell. 2006;190:231–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026

Hernandez PA, Graham CH, Master LL, Albert DL. The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography. 2006;29:773–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2006.04700.x

Guisan A, Graham CH, Elith J, Huettmann F. Sensitivity of predictive species distribution models to change in grain size. Divers Distrib. 2007;13:332–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00342.x

Wisz MS, Hijmans RJ, Li J, Peterson AT, Graham CH, Guisan A, et al. Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Divers Distrib. 2008;14:763–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00482.x

Elith J, Graham CH. Do they? How do they? Why do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models. Ecography. 2009:32:66–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05505.x

Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2018 Jul 20]. Available from: https://www.gbif.org/

Zając A, Zając M, editors. Atlas rozmieszczenia roślin naczyniowych w Polsce. Distribution Atlas of Vascular Plants in Poland. Kraków: Nakładem Pracowni Chorologii Komputerowej Instytutu Botaniki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego i Fundacji dla Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego; 2001.

Verey M. Teoretyczna analiza i praktyczne konsekwencje przyjęcia modelowej siatki ATPOL jako odwzorowania stożkowego definiującego konwersję współrzędnych płaskich na elipsoidę WGS-84. Fragm Florist Geobot Pol. 2017;24(2):469–488.

Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudık M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, et al. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Journal of Ecography. 2006;29:129–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x

Pearce J, Ferrier S. An evaluation of alternative algorithms for fitting species distribution models using logistic regression. Journal of Ecological Modelling. 2000;128:147–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00227-6

Anderson RP, Lew D, Peterson AT. Evaluating predictive models of species’ distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models. Journal of Ecological Modelling. 2003;162:211–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00349-6

Czubiński Z. Zagadnienia geobotaniczne Pomorza. Badania Fizjograficzne nad Polską Zachodnią. 1950;2(4):439–658.

Kolanowska M, Szlachetko DL. Niche conservatism of Eulophia alta, a trans-Atlantic orchid species. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2014;83(1):51–57. https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.2014.007

Kolanowska M. Glacial refugia and migration routes of the Neotropical genus Trizeuxis (Orchidaceae). Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2013;82(3):225–230. https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.2013.024

Szczepańska K, Pruchniewicz D, Kossowska M. Modeling the potential distribution of three lichens of the Xanthoparmelia pulla group (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota) in Central Europe. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2015;84(4):431–438. https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.2015.035

Olguín-Monroy HC, Gutiérrez-Blando C, Ríos-Muñoz CA, León-Paniagua L, Navarro-Sigüenza AG. Regionalización biogeográfica de la mastofauna de los bosques tropicales perennifolios de Mesoamérica. Rev Biol Trop. 2013;61(2):937–969. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v61i2.11235

Mateo RG, Vanderpoorten A, Muñoz J, Laenen B, Désamoré A. Modeling species distributions from heterogeneous data for the biogeographic regionalization of the European bryophyte flora. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55648. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055648

Číhal L, Kaláb O, Plášek V. Modeling the distribution of rare and interesting moss species of the family Orthotrichaceae (Bryophyta) in Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2017;86(2):3543. https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.3543

Popiela A. Phytogeographic aspects of the occurrence of forest vascular plant species in Pomerania (northwest Poland). Botanische Jahrbücher. 2004;125(2):97–228. https://doi.org/10.1127/0006-8152/2004/0125-0097

Sotek Z. Distribution paterns, history, and dynamics of peatland vascular plants in Pomerania (NW Poland). Biodivers Res Conserv. 2010;18:1–82. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10119-010-0020-4

Sotek Z, Stasińska M, Malinowski R, Meller E, Grzejszczak G, Kurnicki B. Distribution and habitat properties of Carex pulicaris and Pedicularis sylvatica at their range margin in NW Poland. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2016;85(3):3507. https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.3507

Fick SE, Hijmans RJ. Worldclim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces or global land areas. Int J Climatol. 2017;37(12):4302–4315. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5086

Hiederer R. Mapping soil properties for Europe – spatial representation of soil database attributes. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2013.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.3619

Journal ISSN:
  • 2083-9480 (online)
  • 0001-6977 (print; ceased since 2016)
This is an Open Access journal, which distributes its content under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, provided that the content is properly cited.
The journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and aims to follow the COPE’s principles.
The journal publisher is a member of the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association.
The journal content is indexed in Similarity Check, the Crossref initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism.
Publisher
Polish Botanical Society