Significance of stigma receptivity in intergeneric cross-pollination of Salix × Populus
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Argus GW. Infrageneric classification of Salix in the New World. Ann Arbor, MI: American Society of Plant Taxonomists; 1997. (Systematic Botany Monographs; vol 52).
Skvortsov AK, Zinovjev AG. Willows of Russia and adjacent countries: taxonomical and geographical revision. Joensuu: University of Joensuu; 1999. (Joensuun Yliopisto, Matemaattis-Luonnontieteellisen Tiedekunnan Raporttisarja, Biology; vol 39).
Horland E, Florineth F, Hadacek F. Weiden in Österreich und angrenzenden Gebieten. Wien: Eigenverl. des Arbeitsbereiches Ingenieurbiologie und Landschaftsbau; 2002.
Białobok S. Wierzby: Salix alba L., Salix fragilis L. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe; 1990. (Nasze Drzewa Leśne; vol 13).
Lindegaard KN, Barker JHA. Breeding willows for biomass. Asp Appl Biol. 1997;49:155–162.
Larsson S. Commercial breeding of willow for short rotation coppice. Asp Appl Biol. 1997;49:215–218.
Hanley S, Karp A. Genetic strategy for dissecting complex traits in biomass willows (Salix ssp). Tree Physiol. 2014;34(11):1167–1180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpt089
Rönnberg-Wastljung AC, Gulberg U. Genetics of breeding characters with possible effects on biomass production in Salix viminalis (L.). Theor Appl Genet. 1999;97:531–540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001220051101
Bagniewska-Zadworna A, Zenkteler M, Zenkteler E, Wojciechowicz MK, Barakat A, Carlson JE. A successful application of the embryo rescue technique as a model for studying crosses between Salix viminalis and Populus species. Aust J Bot. 2011;59:382–392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/BT09188
Zenkteler M, Wojciechowicz MK, Bagniewska-Zadworna A, Zenkteler E, Jeżowski S. Intergeneric crossability studies on obtaining hybrids between Salix viminalis and four Populus species. In vivo and in vitro pollination of pistils and the formation of embryos and plantlets. Trees. 2005;19(6):638–643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00468-005-0427-2
Zenkteler E, Zenkteler M, Pasterska R, Wojciechowicz M. Anatomy of pistil and pollen tube transmitting tract in selected species of Salix. Acta Biol Crac Ser Bot. 2014;56:52.
Przyborowski J, Jędryczka M, Ciszewska-Marciniak J, Sulima P, Wojciechowicz KM, Zenkteler E. Evaluation of the yield potential and physicochemical properties of the biomass of Salix viminalis × Populus tremula hybrids. Ind Crops Prod. 2012;36:549–554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.11.018
Zinkl GM, Zwiebel BI, Grier DG, Preuss D. Pollen-stigma adhesion in Arabidopsis: a species-specific interaction mediated by lipophilic molecules in the pollen exine. Development. 1999;126:5431–5440.
Zinkl GM, Preuss D. Dissecting Arabidopsis pollen–stigma interactions reveals novel mechanisms that confer mating specificity. Ann Bot. 2000;85(A suppl):15–21.
Hiscock SJ, Allen AN. Diverse cell signalling pathways regulate pollen–stigma interactions: the search for consensus. New Phytol. 2008;179:286–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02457.x
Edlund AF, Swanson R, Preuss D. Pollen and stigma structure and function: the role of diversity in pollination. Plant Cell. 2004;16:84–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.015800
Sanzol J, Rallo P, Herrero M. Stigmatic receptivity limits the effective pollination period in ‘Agua de Aranjuez’ pear. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2003;128:458–462.
Wolters-Arts M, van der Weer L, van Aelst AC, van As H, Mariani C. Water-conducting properties of lipids during pollen hydration. Plant Cell Environ. 2002;25:513–519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00827.x
Shivanna KR. Pollen biology and biotechnology. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers; 2003.
Heslop-Harrison J, Shivanna KR. The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigma. Ann Bot. 1977;41:1233–1258.
Heslop-Harrison J, Heslop-Harrison Y. Pollen stigma interaction in Leguminoseae. The organization of the stigma in Trifolium pratense L. Ann Bot. 1983;51:571–583.
Chapman LA, Goring DR. Pollen-pistil interactions regulating successful fertilization in the Brassicaceae. J Exp Bot. 2010;61(7):1939–1957. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq073
Dresselhaus T, Frankling-Tong N. Male–female cross-talk during pollen germination, tube growth and guidance, and double fertilization. Mol Plant. 2013;6(4):1018–1036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mp/sst061
Souza MM, Pereira TNS, Dias AJB, Ribeiro BR, Viana AP. Structural, histochemical and cytochemical characteristics of the stigma and style in Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpa (Passifloraceae). Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 2006;49(1):93–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132006000100011
Cheung AY, Wu HM, Di Stilio V, Glaven R, Chen C, Wong E, et al. Pollen–pistil interactions in Nicotiana tabacum. Ann Bot. 2000;85(A suppl):29–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1999.1016
Heslop-Harrison Y. Control gates and micro-ecology: the pollen–stigma interaction in perspective. Ann Bot. 2000;85(A suppl):5–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1999.1063
Galen C, Shykoff JA, Plowright RC. Consequences of stigma receptivity schedules for sexual selection in flowering plants. Am Nat. 1986;127:462–476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/284495
Ter-Avanesian DV. The effect of varying the number of pollen grains used in fertilization. Theor Appl Genet. 1978;52(2):77–79.
Silva LAC, Pagliarini MS, Santos SA, Valle CB. Stigma receptivity, mode of reproduction, and mating system in Mesosetum chaseae Luces (Poaceae), a native grass of the Brazilian Pantanal. Genet Mol Res. 2013;12(4):5038–5045. http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/2013.October.25.2
Rajora OP, Zsufa L. Pollen viability of some Populus species as indicated by in vitro pollen germination and tetrazolium chloride staining. Can J Bot. 1986;64:1086–1088. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/b86-148
Brewbaker JL, Kwack BH. The essential role of calcium ion in pollen germination and pollen tube growth. Am J Bot. 1963;50:859–865. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2439772
Dafni A, Maués M. A rapid and simple procedure to determine stigma receptivity. Sex Plant Reprod. 1998;11:177–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004970050138
Mc lnnis SM, Emery DC, Porter R, Desikan R, Hancock JT, Hiscock SJ. The role of stigma peroxidases in flowering plants: insights from further characterization of a stigma-specific peroxidase (SSP) from Senecio squalidus (Asteraceae). J Exp Bot. 2006;57(8):1835–1846. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erj182
de Las-Heras MA, Hidalgo PJ, Ubera JL. Stigmatic cuticle in Hedysarum glomeratum: structure and function. Int J Dev Biol. 2001;45:41–42.
Chen F, Yuan W, Shi XP, Ye YM. Evaluation of pollen viability, stigma receptivity and fertilization success in Lagerstroemia indica L. Afr J Biotechnol. 2013;12(46):6460–6467. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.3594
Randall BW, Walton DW, Lee DJ, Wallace HM. Comparison of three pollination methods for Eucalyptus argophloia, a small-flowered eucalypt. Ann For Sci. 2015;72(1):127–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13595-014-0407-z
Saska MM, Kuzovkina YA. Phenological stages of willow (Salix). Ann Appl Biol. 2010;156:431–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2010.00400.x
Harder LD. Prusinkiewicz P. The interplay between inflorescence development and function as the crucible of architectural diversity. Ann Bot. 2012;109(4):761–772. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcs252
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.3498
|
|
|