New perspectives in nectar evolution and ecology: simple alimentary reward or a complex multiorganism interaction?

Massimo Nepi

Abstract


Floral and extra-floral nectars are secretions elaborated by specific organs (nectaries) that can be associated with plant reproductive structures (the so-called floral nectaries found only in angiosperms) or vegetative parts (extrafloral nectaries). These secretions are common in terrestrial vascular plants, especially angiosperms. Although gymnosperms do not seem to have true nectar, their ovular secretions may share evolutionary links with angiosperm nectar. Nectar is generally involved in interactions with animals and by virtue of its sugar and amino acid content, it has been considered a reward offered by plants to animals in exchange for benefits, mainly pollination and indirect defense against herbivores. These relationships are often cited as examples of classical mutualistic interactions. Nonetheless, recent studies dealing with compounds less abundant than sugars and amino acids challenge this view and suggest that nectar is much more complex than simply a reward in the form of food. Nectar proteins (nectarins) and nectar secondary compounds have no primary nutritious function but are involved in plant–animal relationships in other ways. Nectarins protect against proliferation of microorganisms and infection of plant tissues by pathogens. Nectar secondary compounds can be involved in modulating the behavior of nectar feeders, maximizing benefits for the plant. Nectar-dwelling microorganisms (mainly yeasts) were recently revealed to be a third partner in the scenario of plant–animal interactions mediated by nectar. There is evidence that yeast has a remarkable impact on nectar feeder behavior, although the effects on plant fitness have not yet been clearly assessed.

Keywords


nectar; plant–animal interactions; indirect defense; pollination; nectar secondary compounds; nectar proteins; microorganisms

Full Text:

PDF

References


Koptur S, Palacios-Rios M, Díaz-Castelazo C, Mackay WP, Rico-Gray V. Nectar secretion on fern fronds associated with lower levels of herbivore damage: field experiments with a widespread epiphyte of Mexican cloud forest remnants. Ann Bot. 2013;111:1277–1283. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct063

Ward PS. Phylogeny, classification, and species-level taxonomy of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa. 2007;1668:549–563.

Nepi M, von Aderkas P, Wagner R, Mugnaini S, Coulter A, Pacini E. Nectar and pollination drops: how different are they? Ann Bot. 2009;104:205–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp180

De la Barreira E, Nobel PS. Nectar: properties, floral aspects, and speculations on origin. Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9:65–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2003.12.003

Marazzi B, Bronstein JL, Koptur S. The diversity, ecology and evolution of extra-floral nectaries: current perspectives and future challenges. Ann Bot. 2013;111:1243–1250. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct109

Weber MG, Keeler HK. The phylogenetic distribution of extra-floral nectaries in plants. Ann Bot. 2013;111:1251–1261. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcs225

Wäckers F. It pays to be sweet: sugars in mutualistic interactions. Biologist. 2002;49:165–169.

Bernardello G. A systematic survey of floral nectaries. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, editors. Nectaries and nectar. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007. p. 19–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5937-7_2

Labandeira CC, Kvaçek J, Mostovski MB. Pollination drops, pollen, and insect pollination of Mesozoic gymnosperms. Taxon. 2007;56:663–695. https://doi.org/10.2307/25065853

Procheş Ş, Johnson SD. 2009. Beetle pollination of the fruit-scented cones of the South African cycad Stangeria eriopus. Am J Bot. 2009;96:1722–1730. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0800377

Gong YB, Yang M, Vamosi JC, Yang HM, Mu WX, Li JK, et al. Wind or insect pollination? Ambophily in a subtropical gymnosperm Gnetum parvifolium (Gnetales). Plant Species Biol. 2016;31(4):271–279. https://doi.org/101111/1442-1984.12112

Rydin C, Bolinder K. Moonlight pollination in the gymnosperm Ephedra (Gnetales). Biol Lett. 2015;11:20140993. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0993

Bolinder K, Humphreys AM, Ehrlén J, Alexandersson R, Ickert-Bond SM, Rydin C. From near extinction to diversification by means of a shift in pollination mechanism in the gymnosperm relict Ephedra (Ephedraceae, Gnetales). Bot J Linn Soc. 2016;180:461–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12380

Jörgensen A, Rydin C. Reproductive morphology in the Gnetum cuspidatum group (Gnetales) and its implications for pollination biology in the Gnetales. Plant Ecol Evol. 2015;148:387–396. https://doi.org/10.5091/plecevo.2015.1142

Ren D, Labandeira CC, Santiago-Blay JA, Rasnitsyn A, Shih CK, Bashkuev A, et al. A probable pollination mode before angiosperms: Eurasian, long-proboscid scorpionflies. Science. 2009;326:840–847. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1178338

Crepet LM, Niklas KJ. Darwin’s second “abominable mystery”: why are there so many angiosperm species? Am J Bot. 2009;96:366–381. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0800126

Nicolson SW. Nectar consumers. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, editors. Nectaries and nectar. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007. p. 289–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5937-7_7

González-Teuber M, Heil M. Nectar chemistry is tailored for both attraction of mutualists and protection from exploiters. Plant Signal Behav. 2009;4:809–813. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.4.9.9393

Nicolson SW, Thornburg RW. Nectar chemistry. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, editors. Nectaries and nectar. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007. p. 215–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5937-7_5

Nepi M. Nectar: plant interface for complex interaction with biotic environment. In: Ramawat KG, Mérillon JM, Shivanna KR, editors. Reproductive biology of plants. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2012. p. 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16535-13

Baker HG, Baker I. Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type. In: Little RJ, Jones CE, editors. Handbook of pollination biology. New York, NY: Scientific and Academic Editions; 1983. p. 117–141.

Johnson SD, Nicholson S. Evolutionary associations between nectar properties and specificity in bird pollination systems. Biol Lett. 2008;4:49–52. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0496

Napier KR, McWhorter TJ, Nicolson S, Fleming PA. Sugar preferences of avian nectarivores are correlated with intestinal sucrase activity. Physiol Biochem Zool. 2013;86:499–514. https://doi.org/10.1086/672013

Blüthgen N, Fiedler K. Preferences for sugar and amino acids and their conditionality in a diverse nectar-feeding ant community. J Anim Ecol. 2004;73:155–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2004.00789.x

Heil M, Rattke J, Bolland W. Postsecretory hydrolysis of nectar sucrose and specialization in ant/plant mutualism. Science. 2005;308:560–563. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1107536

Bertazzini M, Medrzycki P, Bortolotti L, Maistrello L, Forlani G. Amino acid content and nectar choice by forager honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Amino Acids. 2010;39:315–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-010-0474-x

Nocentini D, Pacini E, Guarnieri M, Nepi M. Flower morphology, nectar traits and pollinators of Cerinthe major (Boraginaceae-Lithospermeae). Flora. 2012;207:186–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2012.01.004

Petanidou T. Ecological and evolutionary aspects of floral nectars in Mediterranean habitats. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, editors. Nectaries and nectar. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007. p. 343–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5937-7_8

González-Teuber M, Heil M. The role of extra-floral nectar amino acids for the preferences of facultative and obligate ant mutualists. J Chem Ecol. 2009;35:459–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-009-9618-4

Adler LS. The ecological significance of toxic nectar. Oikos. 2000;91:409–420. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910301.x

Stevenson PC, Nicolson SW, Wright JA. Plant secondary metabolites in nectar: impacts on pollinators and ecological functions. Funct Ecol. 2017;31:65–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12761

Manson JS, Cook D, Gardner DR, Irwin RE. Dose-dependent effects of nectar alkaloids in a montane plant-pollinator community. J Ecol. 2013;101:1604–1612. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12144

Kessler D, Gasse K, Baldwin IT. Field experiments with transformed plants reveal the sense of floral scents. Science. 2008;321:1200–1202. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160072

Kessler D, Baldwin IT. Making sense of nectar scents: the effects of nectar secondary metabolites on floral visitors to Nicotiana attenuata. Plant J. 2007;49:840–854. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02995.x

Singaravelan NG, Nee’man G, Inbar M, Izhaki I. Feeding responses of free-flying honeybees, to secondary compounds mimicking floral nectars. J Chem Ecol. 2005;31:2791–2804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-005-8394-z

Singaravelan N. Secondary compounds in nectar: the other side of the coin. In: Zhang W, Liu H, editors. Behavioral and chemical ecology. New York, NY: Nova Publishers; 2010. p. 217–238.

Wright GA, Baker DD, Palmer MJ, Stabler D, Mustard JA, Power EF, et al. Caffeine in floral nectar enhances a pollinator’s memory of reward. Science. 2013;339:1202–1204. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1228806

Couvillon MJ, Al Toufailia H, Butterfield TM, Schrell F, Ratnieks FLW, Schurch R. Caffeinated forage tricks honeybees into increasing foraging and recruitment behaviours. Curr Biol. 2015;25:2815–2818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.052

Nepi M. Beyond nectar sweetness: the hidden ecological role of non-protein amino acids in nectar. J Ecol. 2014;102:108–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12170

Stevenson PA. Co-localisation of taurine- with transmitter-immunoreactivities in the nervous system of the migratory locust. J Comp Neurol. 1999;404:86–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990201)404:1<86::AID-CNE7>3.0.CO;2-8

Bown AW, MacGregor KB Shelp BJ. Gamma-aminobutyrate: defense against invertebrate pests? Trends Plant Sci. 2006;11:424–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2006.07.002

Shoonhoven L, van Loon JJA, Dicke M. Insect–plant biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.

Watanabe M, Maemura K, Kanbara K, Tamayama T, Hayasaki H. GABA and GABA receptors in the central nervous system and other organs. Int Rev Cytol. 2002;213:1–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7696(02)13011-7

Zhang M, Izumi I, Kagamimori S, Sokejima S, Yamagami T, Liu Z, et al. Role of taurine supplementation to prevent exercise-induced oxidative stress in healthy young men. Amino Acids. 2004;26:203–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-003-0002-3

Hill CA, Harris RC, Kim HJ, Harris BD, Sale C, Boobis LH, et al. Influence of β-alanine supplementation on skeletal muscle carnosine concentrations and high intensity cycling capacity. Amino Acids. 2007;32:225–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-006-0364-4

Nepi M, Nocentini D, Guarnieri M, Bogo G, Laura B, Galloni M, et al. Non-protein amino acids in nectar: are they tools to modulate insect behavior and increase plant reproductive output? In: Book of abstracts of the International Congress on Plant Reproduction; 2014 Sep 16, Bologna, Italy. Bologna: University of Bologna; 2014. p. 12.

Cardoso-Gustavson P, Andreazza NL, Sawaya ACHF, de Moraes Castro M. Only attract ants? The versatility of petiolar extrafloral nectaries in Passiflora. Am J Plant Sci. 2013;4:460–469. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2013.42A059

Beutler R. Nectar. Bee World. 1935;24:106–162.

Carter C, Thornburg RW. Is the nectar redox cycle a floral defense against microbial attack? Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9:320–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2004.05.008

Carter C, Healy R, O’Tool NM, Naqvi SMS, Ren G, Park S, et al. Tobacco nectaries express a novel NADPH oxidase implicated in the defense of floral reproductive tissues against microorganisms. Plant Physiol. 2007;143:389–399. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.089326

Kram B, Bainbridge E, Perera M, Carter C. Identification, cloning and characterization of a GDSL lipase secreted into the nectar of Jacaranda mimosifolia. Plant Mol Biol. 2008;68:173–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-008-9361-1

González-Teuber M, Pozo MJ, Muck A., Svatos A, Adame-Álvarez RM, Heil M. Glucanases and chitinases as causal agents in the protection of Acacia extrafloral nectar from infestation by phytopathogens. Plant Physiol. 2010;152:1705–1715. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.148478

Hillwig MS, Kanobe C, Thornburg RW, MacIntosh GC. Identification of S-RNase and peroxidase in Petunia nectar. J Plant Physiol. 2011;168:734–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2010.10.002

Nepi M, Bini L, Bianchi L, Puglia M, Abate M, Cai G. Xylan-degrading enzymes in male and female flower nectar of Cucurbita pepo. Ann Bot. 2011;108:521–527. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr165

Seo PJ, Wielsch N, Kessler D, Svatos A, Park CM, Baldwin IT, et al. Natural variation in floral nectar proteins of two Nicotiana attenuata accessions. BMC Plant Biol. 2013;13:101. https://doi.org/doi:10.1186/1471-2229-13-101

Zha HG, Liu T, Zhou JJ, Sun H. MS-desi, a desiccation-related protein in the floral nectar of the evergreen velvet bean (Mucuna sempervirens Hemsl): molecular identification and characterization. Planta. 2013;238:77–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-013-1876-2

Zhou Y, Li M, Zhao F, Zha ., Yang L, Lu, Y., et al. Floral nectary morphology and proteomic analysis of nectar of Liriodendron tulipifera Linn. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:826. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00826

Heil M, Barajas-Barron A, Orona-Tamayo D, Wielsch N, Svatos A. Partner manipulation stabilises a horizontally transmitted mutualism. Ecol Lett. 2014;17:185–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12215

Bubán T, Orosz-Kovacs Z, Farkas A. The nectary as the primary site of infection by Erwinia amylovora (Burr.) Winslow et al.: a mini review. Plant Syst Evol. 2003;238:183–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-002-0266-1

Sasu MA, Seidl-Adams I, Wall K, Winsor JA, Stephenson AG. Floral transmission of Erwinia tracheiphila by cucumber beetles in a wild Cucurbita pepo. Environ Entomol. 2010;39:140–148. https://doi.org/10.1603/EN09190

Herrera CM, de Vega C, Canto A, Pozo MI. Yeasts in floral nectar: a quantitative survey. Ann Bot. 2009;103:1415–1423. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp026

Canto A, Herrera CM. Micro-organisms behind the pollination scenes: microbial imprint on floral nectar sugar variation in a tropical plant community. Ann Bot. 2012;110:1173–1183. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp026

Mittelbach M, Yurkov AM, Nocentini D, Nepi M, Weigend M, Begerow D. Nectar sugars and bird visitation define a floral niche for basidiomycetous yeast on the Canary Islands. BMC Ecol. 2015;15:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-015-0036-x

Canto A, Herrera CM, García IM, Pérez R, Vaz M. Intraplant variation in nectar traits in Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae) as related to floral phase, environmental conditions and pollinator exposure. Flora. 2011;206:668–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2011.02.003

de Vega C, Herrera CM. Micro-organisms transported by ants induce changes in floral nectar composition of an ant-pollinated plant. Am J Bot. 2013;100:792–800. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1200626

Pozo MI, Lievens B, Jacquemin H. Impact of microorganisms on nectar chemistry, pollinator attraction and plant fitness. In: Peck RL, editor. Nectar: production, chemical composition and benefits to animals and plants. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers; 2014. p. 1–40.

Ehlers BK, Olesen JM. The fruit-wasp route to toxic nectar in Epipactis orchids. Flora. 1996;192:223–229.

Raguso RA. Why are some floral nectars scented? Ecology. 2004;85:1486–1494. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0410

Raguso RA. Floral scent in a whole-plant context: moving beyond pollinator attraction. Funct Ecol. 2009;23:837–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01643.x

Herrera CM, Pozo MI, Medrano M. Yeasts in nectar of an early-blooming herb: sought by bumble bees, detrimental to plant fecundity. Ecology. 2013;94:273–279. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-0595.1

Vannette RL, Gauthier M-PL, Fukami, T. Nectar bacteria, but not yeast, weaken a plant–pollinator mutualism. Proc R Soc B. 2013;280:20122601. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2601

Kennedy DO. Plants and human brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

Caruso M, Fiore C, Contursi M, Salzano G, Paparella A, Romano P. Formation of biogenic amines for the selection of wine yeasts. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;18:159–163. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014451728868

Vannette R, Fukami T. Nectar microbes can reduce secondary metabolites in nectar and alter effects on nectar consumption by pollinators. Ecology. 2016;97:1419–1419. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-0858.1

Grasso D, Pandolfi C, Bazihizina N, Nocentini D, Nepi M, Mancuso S. Extrafloral-nectar based partner manipulation in plant-ant relationships. AoB Plants. 2015;7:plv002. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plv002




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.1704

Journal ISSN:
  • 2300-357X (online)
  • 0065-0951 (print; ceased since 2016)
This is an Open Access journal, which distributes its content under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, provided that the content is properly cited.
The journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and aims to follow the COPE’s principles.
The journal publisher is a member of the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association.
The journal content is indexed in Similarity Check, the Crossref initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism.
Publisher
Polish Botanical Society