Influence of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) as intercrop with spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) on the diversity of weed communities

Krzysztof Orzech, Maria Wanic

Abstract


The paper presents results of 3 years of studies (2009–2011) on the influence of Italian ryegrass on the development of weed communities in spring barley (without chemical weeds control) cultivated after potato, spring wheat and spring barley. The reaction of spring barley to the choice of the forecrop was compared with identical plots with pure stand of that cereal where herbicides were applied for weeds control. Evaluation of infestation with weeds was conducted during barley tillering and before harvest. That evaluation considered the number and composition of weed species. During harvest, the dry mass of weeds was also considered. The results were used for determination of Shannon-Wiener diversity index and species homogeneity coefficient, Simpson’s index of dominance as well as Sørensen similarity index.

Spring barley weeding was significantly higher in case of cultivating it in mixed stand with Italian ryegrass (without chemical control), than in pure stand (with control). In the plots with mixed crop, lower diversity and homogeneity of weeds’ communities were recorded than in pure stand. Barley in mixed crop sown after spring barley, during both times of evaluation (spring and before harvest), increased the value of the index of dominance according to the number of species the most. As concerns the composition of species, number and biomass, the communities of pure stand and mixed crop with Italian ryegrass on the plot after potato were the most similar.

Keywords


Lolium multiflorum; mixed crop; number and biomass of weeds; diversity of weeds; similarity of communities; indicators; Hordeum vulgare

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrzejewska J. Międzyplony w zmianowaniach zbożowych. Post Nauk Roln. 1999; 1(277): 19–31.

Cherr CM, Scholberg JMS, McSorley R. Green manure approaches to crop production. Agron J. 2006; 98(2): 302. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0035

Müller T, Thorup-Kristensen K, Magid J, Jensen LS, Hansen S. Catch crops affect nitrogen dynamics in organic farming systems without livestock husbandry – simulations with the DAISY model. Ecol Model. 2006; 191(3–4): 538–544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.05.026

Jaskulska J, Gałęzewski L. Aktualna rola międzyplonów w produkcji roślinnej i środowisku. Fragm Agron. 2009; 26(3): 48–57.

Borresen T. Ryegrass and white clover undersown in small grains at three nitrogen levels and four tillage treatments: after-effect on grain yields and soil structure. In: Lindén B, editor. The use of catch or cover crops to reduce leaching and erosion. Knivsta, Swedwn: Nordiska Jordbruksforskares Förening; 1995. p. 25–32.

Svensson KS, Lewan E, Clarholm M. Effects of a ryegrass catch crop on microbial biomass and mineral nitrogen in an arable soil during winter. Swed J Agric Res. 1994; 24(1): 31–38.

Thomsen IK, Christensen BT. Yields of wheat and soil carbon and nitrogen contents following long-term incorporation of barley straw and ryegrass catch crops. Soil Use Manag. 2006; 20(4): 432–438. http://dx.doi.org/

1111/j.1475-2743.2004.tb00393.x

Acharya BD, Khattri GB, Chettri MK, Srivastava SC. Effect of Brassica campestris var. toria as a catch crop on Orobanche aegyptiaca seed bank. Crop Prot. 2002; 21(7): 533–537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(01)00137-5

Akemo MC, Regnier EE, Bennett MA. Weed suppression in spring-sown rye (Secale cereale)–pea (Pisum sativum) cover crop mixes. Weed Technol. 2000; 14(3): 545–549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2000)014[0545:WSISSR]2.0.CO;2

Teasdale J, Beste E, Potts W. Response of weeds tillage and crop residue. Weed Sci. 1991; 39: 195–199.

Parylak D, Kita W. Zabiegi regeneracyjne a porażenie pszenżyta ozimego w monokulturze przez choroby podstawy źdźbła. Prog Plant Prot. 40: 627–630.

Gawęda D. Wpływ międzyplonów ścierniskowych na zachwaszczenie jęczmienia jarego uprawianego w monokulturze. Ann UMCS Agric. 2009; 64(3): 21–28.

Kwiatkowski C. Wpływ międzyplonu na plonowanie i zachwaszczenie jęczmienia jarego uprawianego w monokulturze. Ann UMCS Sect E. 2004; 59(2): 809–815.

Marshall EJP, Brown VK, Boatman ND, Lutman PJW, Squire GR, Ward LK. The role of weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields. Weed Res. 2003; 43(2): 77–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2003.00326.x

Hartl W. Influence of undersown clovers on weeds and on the yield of winter wheat in organic farming. Agric Ecosyst Env. 1989; 27(1–4): 389–396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(89)90099-6

Hiltbrunner J, Jeanneret P, Liedgens M, Stamp P, Streit B. Response of weed communities to legume living mulches in winter wheat. J Agron Crop Sci. 2007; 193(2): 93–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2007.00250.x

Jastrzębska M. Mieszanki odmianowe pszenicy ozimej i jęczmienia jarego w płodozmianach zbożowych. Olsztyn: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego; 2009. (Rozprawy i Monografie – Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie; vol 151).

Płaza A, Ceglarek F. Wpływ wsiewek na zachwaszczenie jęczmienia jarego. Prog Plant Prot. 2008; 48: 1462–1465.

Thorsted MD, Olesen JE, Koefoed N. Effects of white clover cultivars on biomass and yield in oat/clover intercrops. J Agric Sci. 2002;138(3):261–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859602002010

Wanic M, Kostrzewska MK, Jastrzębska M, Brzezin GM. Rola wsiewek międzyplonowych w regulacji zachwaszczenia jęczmienia jarego w płodozmianach zbożowych. Fragm Agron. 2004; 1(18): 85–102.

Simpson EH. Measurement of diversity. Nature. 1949; 163(4148): 688–688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/163688a0

Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communications. Bell Syst Tech J. 1948; 27: 379–424.

Wiener N. Cybernetics or control and communications in the animals and the machine. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1948.

Sørensen T. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant society based on similarity of species content. K Dan Vidensk Selesk. 1948; 5: 1–34.

Mirek Z, Piękoś-Mirkowa H, Zając A, Zając M. Vascular plant sof Poland – a checklist. Cracow: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences; 1995. (Polish botanical studies – guidebook series; vol 15).

Wanic M, Jastrzębska M, Nowicki J. Wsiewki międzyplonowe a zachwaszczenie jęczmienia jarego uprawianego w różnych stanowiskach. Fragm Agron. 2005; 2: 238–248.

Tendziagolska E. Zmiany wybranych właściwości fizycznych gleby w uprawie owsa nagiego w systemie ekologicznym. Probl Inż Rol. 2010; 2: 31–39.

Kostrzewska MK, Wanic M, Jastrzębska M, Nowicki J. Wpływ życicy wielokwiatowej jako wsiewki międzyplonowej na różnorodność zbiorowisk chwastów w jęczmieniu jarym. Fragm Agron. 2011; 28(3): 42–52.

Stupnicka-Rodzynkiewicz E, Stepnik K, AL. Wpływ zmianowania, sposobu uprawy roli i herbicydów na bioróżnorodność zbiorowisk chwastów. Acta Sci Pol Agric. 2004; 3(2): 235–245.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2014.040

Journal ISSN:
  • 2300-357X (online)
  • 0065-0951 (print; ceased since 2016)
This is an Open Access journal, which distributes its content under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, provided that the content is properly cited.
The journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and aims to follow the COPE’s principles.
The journal publisher is a member of the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association.
The journal content is indexed in Similarity Check, the Crossref initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism.
Publisher
Polish Botanical Society