Internal structure and photosynthetic performance of Nostoc sp. colonies in the high Arctic

Jana Kvíderová

Abstract


The physiological performance of Nostoc sp. colonies in the high Arctic was investigated based on their structure and function. To investigate the internal colony structure, a method based on vertical stacking of individual light microscopy images was tested under the conditions at a polar field station. The physiological state of sun-exposed and shaded surfaces of the colonies was assessed using variable chlorophyll fluorescence imaging under two distinct low- and high-light conditions. The 3D image of the internal structure of the colonies revealed a high number of cells in the central part of the colony. Two peaks of maximum cell density were observed, probably caused by two overlapping colony lobes or subcolonies. Light was the driving factor of photosynthetic activity, and the colony structure played a role in the rate of response to incoming light. Fluorescence imaging revealed heterogeneity of the photosynthetic activity in the colonies, with the maximum photosynthetic activity at the colony edge due to better access to nutrients. The differences between exposed and shaded surfaces were not as pronounced as was expected, either due to good photoacclimation to a broad range of light conditions, light distribution through translucent extracellular matrixes, or integration of fluorescence signals throughout the colonies. The slightly better photosynthetic performance under high light conditions may indicate photoacclimation of Nostoc sp. to a broad range of light conditions encountered in the field.

Keywords


Nostoc sp.; photosynthesis; 3D structure; light microscopy; Arctic; fluorescence imaging

Full Text:

PDF

References


Broady PA. Diversity, distribution and dispersal of Antarctic algae. Biodivers Conserv. 1996;5:1307–1335. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051981

Elster J. Ecological classification of terrestrial algal communities in polar environments. In: Beyer L, Bötler M, editors. Geoecology of Antarctic ice-free coastal landscapes. Springer; 2002. p. 303–326. (Ecological Studies; vol 154). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56318-8_17

Elster J, Benson EE. Life in the polar terrestrial environment with a focus on algae and cyanobacteria. In: Fuller BJ, Lane N, Benson EE, editors. Life in the frozen state. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2004. p. 111–150. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203647073.ch3

Vincent WF. Cyanobacterial dominance in the Polar regions. In: Whitton BA, Potts M, editors. The ecology of cyanobacteria. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000. p. 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46855-7_12

Zakhia F, Jungblut AD, Taton A, Vincent WF, Wilmotte A. Cyanobacteria in cold ecosystems. In: Margesin R, Schinner F, Marx JC, Gerday C, editors. Psychrophiles: from biodiversity to biotechnology. Berlin: Springer; 2008. p. 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74335-4_8

Jungblut AD, Vincent WF. Cyanobacteria in the polar and alpine ecosystems. In: Margesin R, editor. Psychrophiles: from biodiversity to biotechnology. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57057-0_9

Morgan-Kiss RM, Priscu JC, Pocock T, Gudynaite-Savitch L, Huner NPA. Adaptation and acclimation of photosynthetic microorganisms to permanently cold environments. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006;70(1):222–252. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.70.1.222-252.2006

Schulze ED, Beck E, Müller-Hohenstein K. Plant ecology. Berlin: Springer; 2005.

Gao K, Ai H. Relationship of growth and photosynthesis with colony size in an edible cyanobacterium, Ge-Xian-Mi Nostoc (Cyanophyceae). J Phycol. 2004;40:523–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2004.03155.x

Li Y, Gao K. Photosynthetic physiology and growth as a function of colony size in the cyanobacterium Nostoc sphaeroides. Eur J Phycol. 2004;39:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967026032000157147

Paerl HW, Pinckney JL, Steppe TF. Cyanobacterial-bacterial mat consortia: examining the functional unit of microbial survival and growth in extreme environments. Environ Microbiol. 2000;2(1):11–26. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1462-2920.2000.00071.x

Belnap J, Lange OL. Structure and functioning of biological soil crusts: a synthesis. In: Belnap J, Lange OL, editors. Biological soil crusts: structure, function, and management. Berlin: Springer; 2001. p. 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56475-8_33

Pushkareva E, Johansen JR, Elster J. A review of the ecology, ecophysiology and biodiversity of microalgae in Arctic soil crusts. Polar Biol. 2016;39(12):2227–2240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-016-1902-5

Schneider T, Schmid E, de Castro JV, Cardinale M, Eberl L, Grube M, et al. Structure and function of the symbiosis partners of the lung lichen (Lobaria pulmonaria L. Hoffm.) analyzed by metaproteomics. Proteomics. 2011;11(13):2752–2756. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201000679

Tashyreva D, Elster J. Production of dormant stages and stress resistance of polar cyanobacteria. In: Hanslmeier A, Kempe S, Seckbach J, editors. Life on Earth and other planetary bodies. Dordrecht: Springer; 2012. p. 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4966-5_21

Aguilera A, Souza-Egipsy V, Gomez F, Amils R. Development and structure of eukaryotic biofilms in an extreme acidic environment, Rio Tinto (SW, Spain). Microb Ecol. 2007;53(2):294–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-006-9092-2

Flemming HC, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(9):623–633. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2415

Kvíderová J. Biofilm. In: Amils R, Gargaud M, Cernicharo Quintanilla J, Cleaves HJ, Irvine WM, Pinti D, et al., editors. Encyclopedia of astrobiology. Berlin: Springer; 2015. p. 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27833-4_170-3

Tamaru Y, Takani Y, Yoshida T, Sakamoto T. Crucial role of extracellular polysaccharides in desiccation and freezing tolerance in the terrestrial cyanobacterium Nostoc commune. Appl Environ Microb. 2005;71(11):7327–7333. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.71.11.7327-7333.2005

Deng Z, Hu Q, Lu F, Liu G, Hu Z. Colony development and physiological characterization of the edible blue-green alga, Nostoc sphaeroides (Nostocaceae, Cyanophyta). Prog Nat Sci. 2008;18(12):1475–1483. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.03.031

Armstrong R, Bradwell T. Growth of crustose lichens: a review. Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography. 2010;92(1):3–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0459.2010.00374.x

Wharton RA, Parker BC, Simmons GM. Distribution, species composition and morphology of algal mats in Antarctic dry valley lakes. Phycologia. 1983;22(4):355–365. https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-22-4-355.1

MacIntyre HL, Geider RJ, Miller DC. Microphytobenthos: the ecological role of the “secret garden” of unvegetated, shallow-water marine habitats. I. Distribution, abundance and primary production. Estuaries. 1996;19(2):186–201. https://doi.org/10.2307/1352224

de los Ríos A, Ascaso C, Wierzchos J, Fernández-Valiente E, Quesada A. Microstructural characterization of cyanobacterial mats from the McMurdo Ice Shelf, Antarctica. Appl Environ Microb. 2004;70(1):569–580. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.70.1.569-580.2004

Komárek O, Komárek J. Diversity and ecology of cyanobacterial microflora of Antarctic seepage habitats: comparison of King George Island, Shetland Islands, and James Ross Island, NW Weddell Sea, Antarctica. In: Seckbach J, Oren A, editors. Microbial mats: modern and ancient microorganisms in stratified systems. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010. p. 515–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3799-2_27

Taton A, Grubisic S, Brambilla E, de Wit R, Wilmotte A. Cyanobacterial diversity in natural and artificial microbial mats of Lake Fryxell (McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica): a morphological and molecular approach. Appl Environ Microb. 2003;69(9):5157–5169. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.9.5157-5169.2003

Revsbech NP, Jorgensen BB, Blackburn TH, Cohen Y. Microelectrode studies of the photosynthesis and O2, H2S, and pH profiles of a microbial mat. Limnol Oceanogr. 1983;28(6):1062–1074. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1983.28.6.1062

Glud RN, Kühl M, Kohls O, Ramsing NB. Heterogeneity of oxygen production and consumption in a photosynthetic microbial mat as studied by planar optodes. J Phycol. 1999;35(2):270–279. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.1999.3520270.x

Vopel K, Hawes I. Photosynthetic performance of benthic microbial mats in Lake Hoare, Antarctica. Limnol Oceanogr. 2006;51(4):1801–1812. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.4.1801

Secker NH., Chua JPS, Laurie RE, McNoe L, Guy PL, Orlovich DA, et al. Characterization of the cyanobacteria and associated bacterial community from an ephemeral wetland in New Zealand. J Phycol. 2016;52(5):761–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12434

Komárek J, Kováčik L, Elster J, Komárek O. Cyanobacterial diversity of Petuniabukta, Billefjorden, central Spitzbergen. Pol Polar Res. 2012;33(4):347–368. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10183-012-0024-1

Nedbal L, Soukupová J, Kaftan D, Whitmarsh J, Trtílek M. Kinetic imaging of chlorophyll fluorescence using modulated light. Photosynth Res. 2000;66:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010729821876

Nedbal L, Whitmarsh J. Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging of leaves and fruits. In: Papageorgiou GC, Govindjee, editors. Chlorophyll a fluorescence. A signature of photosynthesis. Dordrecht: Springer; 2004. p. 389–407. (Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration; vol 19). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3218-9_14

Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Method. 2012;9:671. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089

Roháček K, Soukupová J, Barták M. Chlorophyll fluorescence: a wonderful tool to study plant physiology and plant stress. In: Schoefs B, editor. Plant cell compartments-selected topics. Kerala: Research Signpost; 2008. p. 41–104.

Oxborough K, Baker NR. Resolving chlorophyll a fluorescence images of photosynthetic efficiency into photochemical and non-photochemical components – calculation of qP and Fv’/Fm’; without measuring Fo’. Photosynth Res. 1997;54(2):135–142. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005936823310

Statsoft. Statistica, version 13. 2015 [cited 2018 Dec 29]. Available from: http://www.statsoft.com/Products/STATISTICA-Features

Vincent WF, Castenholz RW, Downes MT, Howard-Williams C. Antarctic cyanobacteria: light, nutrients, and photosynthesis in the microbial mat environment. J Phycol. 1993;29(6):745–755. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3646.1993.00745.x

Vincent WF, Downes MT, Castenholz RW, Howard-Williams C. Community structure and pigment organisation of cyanobacteria-dominated microbial mats in Antarctica. Eur J Phycol. 1993;28(4):213–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670269300650321

Hawes I, Howard-Williams C, Vincent W. Desiccation and recovery of antarctic cyanobacterial mats. Polar Biol. 1992;12(6):587–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236981

Potts M. Desiccation tolerance of prokaryotes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1994;58(4):755–805.

Potts M. Mechanisms of desiccation tolerance in cyanobacteria. Eur J Phycol. 1999;34:319–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670269910001736382

Tashyreva D, Elster J. Annual cycles of two cyanobacterial mat communities in hydro-terrestrial habitats of the high Arctic. Microb Ecol. 2016;71(4):887–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-016-0732-x

Makhalanyane TP, Valverde A, Velázquez D, Gunnigle E, van Goethem MW, Quesada A, et al. Ecology and biogeochemistry of cyanobacteria in soils, permafrost, aquatic and cryptic polar habitats. Biodivers Conserv. 2015;24(4):819–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0902-z

Deming JW, Young JN. The role of exopolysaccharides in microbial adaptation to cold habitats. In: Margesin R, editor. Psychrophiles: from biodiversity to biotechnology. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57057-0_12

Cockell CS, Knowland J. Ultraviolet radiation screening compounds. Biol Rev. 1999;79:311–345. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0006323199005356

Garcia-Pichel F, Castenholz RW. Occurrence of UV-absorbing, mycosporine-like compounds among cyanobacterial isolates and an estimate of their screening capacity. Appl Environ Microb. 1993;59(1):163–169.

Sinha RP, Klisch M, Gröniger A, Häder DP. Ultraviolet-absorbing/screening substances in cyanobacteria, phytoplankton and macroalgae. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1998;47(2–3):83–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1011-1344(98)00198-5

Dodds WK. Photosynthesis of two morphologies of Nostoc parmelioides (Cyanobacteria) as related to current velocities and diffusion patterns. J Phycol. 1989;25(2):258–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.1989.tb00121.x

Komárek J. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa 19/3. Cyanoprokaryota. 3. Teil: Heterocytous genera. Heildelberg: Springer; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8274-2737-3

Hrouzek P, Ventura S, Lukešová A, Mugnai MA, Turicchia S, Komárek J. Diversity of soil Nostoc strains: phylogenetic and phenotypic variability. Algol Stud. 2005;117(1):251–264. https://doi.org/10.1127/1864-1318/2005/0117-0251

Lukavský J. Controlled cultivation of algae on agar plates. Algol Stud. 1974;10:90–104.

Lukavský J. Analysis of growth rate of algae by cultivation on solid media. Algol Stud. 1975;14:105–136.

Kvíderová J, Elster J, Šimek M. In situ response of Nostoc commune s. l. colonies to desiccation in central Svalbard, Norwegian high Arctic. Fottea. 2011;11(1):87–97. https://doi.org/10.5507/fot.2011.009

Gao K, Qiu B, Xia J, Yu A, Li Y. Effect of wind speed on loss of water from Nostoc flagelliforme colonies. J Appl Phycol. 1998;10(1):55–58. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008020914486

Dodds WK, Gudder DA, Mollenhauer D. The ecology of Nostoc. J Phycol. 1995;31(1):2–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3646.1995.00002.x

Fukuda S, Yamakawa R, Hirai M, Kashino Y, Koike H, Satoh K. Mechanisms to avoid photoinhibition in a desiccation-tolerant cyanobacterium, Nostoc commune. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008;49(3):488–492. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcn018

Poza-Carrión C, Fernández-Valiente E, Piñas FF, Leganés F. Acclimation of photosynthetic pigments and photosynthesis of the cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. strain UAM206 to combined fluctuations of irradiance, pH, and inorganic carbon availability. J Plant Physiol. 2001;158(11):1455–1461. https://doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-00555