The assessment of incompatibility and cross-compatibility in three populations of European globeflower (Trollius europaeus L.) by observing the pollen tubes growth
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
East EM. The distribution of self-sterility in flowering plants. Proc Am Philos Soc. 1940;82:449–518.
Brewbaker JL. Biology of the angiosperm pollen grain. Indian J Genet Plant Breed. 1959;19:121–133.
Pellmyr O. The cost of mutualism: interactions between Trollius europaeus and its pollinating parasites. Oecologia. 1989;78:53–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377197
Despres L, Ibanez S, Hemborg ÅM, Godelle B. Geographic and within population variation in the globeflower – globeflower fly interaction: the costs and benefits of rearing pollinators’ larvae. Oecologia. 2007;151:240–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0578-x
Jaeger N, Despres L. Obligate mutualism between Trollius europaeus and its seed‐parasite pollinators Chiastocheta flies in the Alps. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences. 1998;321:789–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0764-4469(98)80019-X
Klank C, Pluess AR, Ghazoul J. Effects of population size on plant reproduction and pollinator abundance in a specialized pollination system. J Ecol. 2010;98:1389–1397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01720.x
Lemke T, Porembski S. Variation in the reproductive performance of the Trollius–Chiastocheta mutualism at the edge of its range in north-east Germany. Oecologia. 2012;172:437–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2500-z
Lundqvist A, Österbye U, Larsen K, Linde-Larusen I. Complex of self-incompatibility systems in Ranuculus acris L. and Beta vulgaris L. Heredity. 1973;74:161–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1973.tb01118.x
Antkowiak W. Interpopulation variability of globe flower (Trollius europaeus L. subsp. europaeus) in north-western Poland. Roczniki Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu. Botanika. 2002;5:3–14.
Martin F. Staining and observing pollen tubes by means of fluorescence. Stain Technol. 1959;34:125–128. https://doi.org/10.3109/10520295909114663
Antkowiak W, Wojciechowski A. The evaluation of self-compatibility and crossability in the genus Pyrus based on the observation of pollen tubes growth. Acta Agrobot. 2006;59:91–97. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2006.009
Matsuzawa Y. Studies of the interspecific hybridization in genus Brassica. II. Crossability in interspecific crosses, B. oleracea L. × B. campestris L. Japanese Journal of Breeding. 1983;33:321–330. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs1951.33.321
Pellmyr O. Stability of plant–animal mutualisms: keeping the benefactors at bay. Trends Plant Sci. 1997;2:408–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(97)01127-8
Hemborg AM, Despers L. Oviposition by mutualistic seed-parasitic pollinators and its effects on annual fitness of single- and multi-flowered host plants. Oecologia. 1999;120:427–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050875
Jaeger N, Till-Botraud I, Despers L. Evolutionary conflict between Trollius europaeus and its seed parasite pollinators Chiastocheta flies. Evol Ecol Res. 2000;2:885–896.
Ferdy JB, Despres L, Godelle B. Evolution of mutualism between globeflowers and their pollinating flies. J Theor Biol. 2002;217:219–234. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2002.3018
Denisow B, Żuraw B. Wydajność pyłkowa czterech gatunków pełnika (Trollius L.). Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio EEE Horticultura. 2003;13:85–91.
Suchan T, Beauverd M, Trim N, Alvarez N. Asymmetrical nature of the Trollius–Chiastocheta interaction: insights into the evolution of nursery pollination systems. Ecol Evol. 2015;5(21):4766–4777. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1544
Berry PE, Calvo RN. Wind pollination, self-incompatibility, and altitudinal shifts in pollination systems in the High Andean genus Espeletia (Asteraceae). Am J Bot. 1989;76(11);1602–1614. https://doi.org/10.2307/2444398
Schoen D, Brown ADH. Whole- and part-flower self-pollination in Glycine clandestine and G. argyrea and the evolution of autogamy. Evolution. 1991;45:1651–1664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb02670.x
Nogler G, Genetics of apospory in apomictic Ranunculus auricomus. V. Conclusions. Botanica Helvetica. 1984;94:411–422.
Maltisberger M, Widmer A. Chromosome numbers and karyotypes within the Ranunculus alpestris-group (Ranunculaceae). Organisms, Diversity and Evolution. 2009;9:232–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ode.2009.03.003
Rendle H, Murray BG. Breeding systems and pollen tube behaviour in compatible and incompatible crosses in New Zealand species of Ranunculus L., N Z J Bot. 1988;26(3):467–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.1988.10410649
Lewis D, Crowe LK. Unilateral interspecific incompatibility in flowering plants. Heredity. 1958;12:233–256. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1958.26
Röbbelen G. Uber die Kreuzungsunvertätglichkeit verschiedener Brassica – Arten als Folge eines gehemmten Pollenschlauchwachstems. Zuchter. 1960;30:300–312.
Sampson DR. Intergeneric pollen–stigma incompatibility in the Cruciferae. Can J Genet Cytol. 1962;4:38–49. https://doi.org/10.1139/g62-006
Wojciechowski A. Interspecific hybrids between Brassica campestris and B. oleracea. I. Effectiveness of crossing. Observations of pollen tube growth. The course of embriogenesis. Genetica Polonica. 1985;26(4):423–436.
Wojciechowski A, Andrzejewski RP. Evaluation of crossability in intergeneric crosses Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. × Capsicum annuum L. based on the pollen tube growth. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Biological Sciences. 1986;34(10–12):219–226.
Andrzejewski RP, Mól R. Embryological analyses of developmental stages in floral buds of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Biological Sciences. 1985;33:61–67.
Visser DL. The effects of an alternating temperatures on the self-incompatibility of some clones of Brussel sprouts [Brassica oleracea L. var. gemmifera (DC.) Schultz]. Euphytica. 1977;26:273–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00026988
Hermsen JGTH, Ramanna MS. Barriers to hybridization of Solanum bulbocastanum Dun. and S. verrucosum Schlechtd. and structural hybridity in their F1 plants. Euphytica. 1976;25:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041523
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.3553
|
|
|