Sex-specific responses of Populus deltoides to defoliation
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
May BM, Carlyle JC. Effect of defoliation associated with Essigella californica on growth of mid-rotation Pinus radiata. For Ecol Manage. 2003;183(1–3):297–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00111-7
Carnegie AJ, Matsuki M, Haugenc DA, Hurley BP, Ahumada R, Klasmer P, et al. Predicting the potential distribution of Sirex noctilio (Hymenoptera: Siricidae), a significant exotic pest of Pinus plantations. Ann For Sci. 2006;63(2):119–128. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2005104
Durán A, Gryzenhout M, Slippers B, Ahumada R, Rotella A, Flores F, et al. Phytophthora pinifolia spnov. associated with a serious needle disease of Pinus radiata in Chile. Plant Pathol. 2008;57(4):715–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2008.01893.x
Ma ZF, Liu J, Zhang SQ, Chen WX, Yang SQ. Observed climate changes in southwest China during 1961–2010. Advances in Climate Change Research. 2013;4(1):30–40. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1248.2013.030
Logan JA, Régnière J, Powell JA. Assessing the impacts of global warming on forest pest dynamics. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment. 2003;1(3):130–137. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0130:ATIOGW]2.0.CO;2
Netherer S, Schopf A. Potential effects of climate change on insect herbivores in European forests – general aspects and the pine processionary moth as specific example. For Ecol Manage. 2010;259(4–5):831–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.034
Jacquet JS, Bosc A, O’Grady AP, Jactel H. Pine growth response to processionary moth defoliation across stand chronosequence. For Ecol Manage. 2013;293(1):29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.003
Jean-Sébastien J, Alexandre B, Anthony OG, Hervé J. Combined effects of defoliation and water stress on pine growth and non-structural carbohydrates. Tree Physiol. 2014;34(4):367–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpu018
Wills AJ, Burbidge TE, Abbott I. Impact of repeated defoliation on jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) saplings. Aust For. 2004;67(3):194–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2004.10674934
Pinkard EA. Physiological and growth responses related to pattern and severity of pruning in young Eucalyptus globulus. For Ecol Manage. 2003;182(1–3):231–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00046-X
Pinkard EA, Beadle CL. A physiological approach to pruning. International Forestry Review. 2000;2(4):295–305.
Iqbal N, Masood A, Khan NA. Analyzing the significance of defoliation in growth, photosynthetic compensation and source–sink relations. Photosynthetica. 2012;50(2):161–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-012-0029-3
Collin P, Epron D, Alaoui-sosse B, Badot PM. Growth responses of common ash seedings (Fraxinus excelsior L.) to total and partial defoliation. Ann Bot. 2000;85:317–323. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1999.1045
Haukioja E, Koricheva J. Tolerance to herbivory in woody vs. herbaceous plants. Evol Ecol. 2000;14:551–562. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011091606022
Eyles A, Smith D, Pinkard EA, Smith I, Corkrey R, Elms S, et al. Photosynthetic responses of field grown Pinus radiata trees to artificial and aphid-induced defoliation. Tree Physiol. 2011;31(6):592–603. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpr046
Dickson RE. Carbon and nitrogen allocation in trees. Ann For Sci. 1989;46(suppl):631S-647S. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:198905ART0142
Krauss N, Hinrichs W, Witt I, Fromme P, Pritzkow W, Dauter Z, et al. Three-dimensional structure of system I of photosynthesis at 6 Å resolution. Nature. 1993;361:326–331. https://doi.org/10.1038/361326a0
Vanderklein DW, Reich PR. The effect of defoliation intensity and history on photosynthesis, growth and carbon reserves of two conifers with contrasting leaf lifespans and growth habits. New Phytol. 1999;144:121–132. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00496.x
Li M, Hoch G, Körner C. Source/sink removal affects mobile carbohydrates in Pinus cembra at the swiss treeline. Trees. 2002;16(4–5):331–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-002-0172-8
Hudgeons JL, Knutson AE, Heinz KM, Deloach CJ, Dudley TL, Pattison RR. Defoliation by introduced Diorhabda elongata leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) reduces carbohydrate reserves and regrowth of Tamarix (Tamaricaceae). Biol Control. 2007;43(2):213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.07.012
Palacio S, Paterson E, Sim A, Hester AJ, Millard P. Browsing affects intra-ring carbon allocation in species with contrasting wood anatomy. Tree Physiol. 2011;31(2):150–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpq110
Quentin AG, Beadle CL, O’Grady AP, Pinkard EA. Effects of partial defoliation on closed canopy Eucalyptus globulus Labilladiere: growth, biomass allocation and carbohydrates. For Ecol Manage. 2011;261(3):695–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.11.028
Heyden FVD, Stock WD. Nonstructural carbohydrate allocation following different frequencies of simulated browsing in three semi-arid shrubs. Oecologia. 1995;102(2):238–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333256
Renner SS, Ricklefs RE. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. Am J Bot. 1995;82(5):596–606. https://doi.org/10.2307/2445418
Augustin S, Denux O, Castagneyrol B, Jactel H, Karlinski L, Kieliszewska-Rokicka B, et al. Insect herbivory response to Populus nigra genetic diversity. International Poplar Symposium, Orvieto. 2010. http://www.versailles-grignon.inra.fr
Xu X, Yang F, Xiao X, Zhang S, Korpelainen H, Li C. Sex-specific responses of Populus cathayana to drought and elevated temperatures. Plant Cell Environ. 2008;31(6):850–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01799.x
Zhang S, Jiang H, Zhao H, Korpelainen H, Li C. Sexually different physiological responses of Populus cathayana to nitrogen and phosphorus deficiencies. Tree Physiol. 2014;34(4):343–354. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpu025
Chen L, Zhang L, Tu L, Xu Z, Zhang J, Gao S. Sex-related differences in physiological and ultrastructural responses of Populus cathayana, to Ni toxicity. Acta Physiol Plant. 2014;36(7):1937–1946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-014-1570-4
Lichtenthaler HK. Chlorophyll and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol. 1987;148(34):350–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1
Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE. Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. BBA Bioenergetics. 1989;975(3):384–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2728(89)80347-0
Mitchell AK. Acclimation of Pacific yew (Taxus brevifolia) foliage to sun and shade. Tree Physiol. 1998;18(11):749–757. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/18.11.749
Nelson DW, Sommers LE. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2 ed. Page, A.L. p. 199. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy. 1982.
Livingston NJ, Guy RD, Sun ZJ, Ethier GJ. The effects of nitrogen stress on the stable carbon isotope composition, productivity and water use efficiency of white spruce (Picea glauca) seedlings. Plant Cell Environ. 1999;22(3):281–289. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00400.x
Yemm EW, Willis AJ. The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochem J. 1954;57:508–514. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0570508
Zhao HX, Xu X, Zhang YB. Nitrogen deposition limits photosynthetic response to elevated CO2 differentially in a dioecious species. Oecologia. 2011;165(1):41–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1763-5
Murata T. Enzymic mechanism of starch breakdown in germinating rice seeds I. An analytical study. Plant Physiol. 1968;43(12):1899–1905. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.43.12.1899
Chen Z, Kolb TE, Clancy KM. Mechanisms of Douglas-fir resistance to western spruce budworm defoliation: bud burst phenology, photosynthetic compensation and growth rate. Tree Physiol. 2001;21:1159–1169. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/21.16.1159
Quentin AG, Pinkard EA, Beadle CL, Wardlaw TJ, O’Grady AP, Paterson S, et al. Do artificial and natural defoliation have similar effects on physiology of Eucalyptus globules Labill. Seedlings? Ann For Sci. 2010;67:203–203. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2009096
Wiley E, Huepenbecker S, Casper BB, Helliker BR. The effects of defoliation on carbon allocation: can carbon limitation reduce growth in favour of storage? Tree Physiol. 2013;33(11):1216–1228. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpt093
Ourry A, Boucaud J, Salette J. Nitrogen mobilization from stubble and roots during regrowth of defoliated perennial Ryegrass. J Exp Bot. 1988;39:803–809. https://doi.org/10.1093/ixb/39.6.803
Zhao W, Chen SP, Lin GH. Compensatory growth responses to clipping defoliation in Leymus chinensis (Poaceae) under nutrient addition and water deficiency conditions. Plant Ecol. 2008;196:85–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-007-9336-3
Warren CR, Livingston NJ, Turpin D. Responses of gas exchange to reversible changes in whole plant transpiration rate in two conifer species. Tree Physiol. 2003;23(12):793–803. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/23.12.793
Tarrynl T, Aark AA, Charles RW. Increased photosynthesis following partial defoliation of field-grown Eucalyptus globulus seedlings is not caused by increased leaf nitrogen. Tree Physiol. 2007;27(10):1481–1492. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/27.10.1481
Eyles A, Pinkard EA, O’Grady AP, Corkrey R, Beadle C, Mohammed C. Recovery after defoliation in Eucalyptus globulus saplings: respiration and growth. Trees. 2016;30(5):1543–1555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-016-1388-3
Lavigne MB, Little CA, Major JE. Increasing the sink:source balance enhances photosynthetic rate of 1-year-old balsam fir foliage by increasing allocation of mineral nutrients. Tree Physiol. 2001;21(7):417–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/21.7.417
Matthew JP, Christine HF. Sink regulation of photosynthesis. J Exp Bot. 2001;52:1383–1400. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/52.360.1383
Stitt M. Fructose-2, 6-bisphosphate as a regulatory molecule in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 1990;41:153–185. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.41.060190.001101
Roberts J, Wallace JS, Pitman RM. Factors affecting stomatal conductance of bracken below a forest canopy. J Appl Ecol. 1994;21(2):643–655. https://doi.org/10.2307/2403435
Hart M, Hogg EH, Lieffers VJ. Enhanced water relations of residual foliage following defoliation in Populus tremuloides. Can J Bot. 2000;78(5):583–590. https://doi.org/10.1139/b00-032
Elfadl MA, Luukkanen O. Effect of pruning on Prosopis juliflora: considerations for tropical dryland agroforestry. J Arid Environ. 2003;53(4):441–455. https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.2002.1069
Striker GG, Insausti P, Grimoldi AA. Floodings effects on plants recovering from defoliation in Paspalum dilatetum and Lotus tenuis. Ann Bot. 2008;102:247–254. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn083
Handa IT, Körner C, Hattenschwiler S. A test of the tree-line carbon limitation hypothesis by in situ CO2 enrichment and defoliation. Ecology. 2005;86(5):1288–1300. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0711
Rapley LP, Potts BM, Battaglia M, Patel VS, Allen GR. Longterm realised and projected growth impacts caused by autumn gum moth defoliation of 2-year-old Eucalyptus nitens plantation trees in Tasmania, Australia. For Ecol Manage. 2009;258(9):1896–1903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.06.036
Pinkard EA, Battaglia M, Mohammed CL. Defoliation and nitrogen effects on photosynthesis and growth of Eucalyptus globulus. Tree Physiol. 2007;27(7):1053–1063. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/27.7.1053
Pinkard EA, Eyles A, O’Grady AP. Are gas exchange responses to resource limitation and defoliation linked to source: sink relationships? Plant Cell Environ. 2011;34(10):1652–1665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02361.x
Eyles A, Pinkard EA, Mohammed C. Shifts in biomass and resource allocation patterns following defoliation in Eucalyptus globulus growing with varying water and nutrient supplies. Tree Physiol. 2009;29(6):753–764. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpp014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.3566
|
|
|