Demographic responses of boreal-montane orchid Malaxis monophyllos (L.) Sw. populations to contrasting environmental conditions

Edyta Jermakowicz, Emilia Brzosko

Abstract


In an age of changes in species’ geographical ranges, compounded by climatic and anthropogenic impacts, it become important to know which processes and factors influence plant populations and their persistence in the long term.

Here we investigated dynamic and fitness components in twelve populations of Malaxis monophyllos (L.) Sw., situated in different geographical (regions) and ecological (type of habitat) units. Although M. monophyllos is a rare species, characterized by highly fragmented, boreal-montane distribution range, in last few decades it successfully colonized secondary habitats in Polish uplands. Our results indicate that M. monophyllos is represented mainly by small populations, which annual spatial and temporal changes might be very high, what affects the ephemeral character of these populations, regardless of the region and type of habitat. This dynamic structure, in turn, is caused by intensive exchange of individuals in populations, as well as by their short above-ground life span. Despite the large range of variation in size and reproductive traits, we can distinguish some regional patterns, which indicate boreal region as the most optimal for M. monophyllos growth and persistence in the long term, and with montane and upland/anthropogenic populations, due to lower reproductive parameters, as the most threatened. Although it should be considered that anthropogenic populations, despite their lower reproductive parameters and instability in the long term, present an intermediate, geographical and ecological character, therefore they may be valuable in shaping, both M. monophyllos’ future range, as well as its potential for response on ongoing and future changes. In general, reproduction is the main factor differentiating of M. monophyllos populations in regions, and we can suspect that it may become the cause of the future differentiation and isolation of these populations, occurring with progressive range fragmentation.


Keywords


anthropogenic habitats; population dynamics; red listed species; reproduction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Oostermeijer JGB, Luijten SH, den Nijs JCM. Integrating demographic and genetic approaches in plant conservation. Biol Conserv. 2003;113:389–398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3207(03)00127-7

Ackerman JD. Evolutionary potential in orchids: patterns and strategies for conservation. Selbyana. 1998;19:8–14.

Lienert J. Habitat fragmentation effects on fitness of plant populations – a review. Journal for Nature Conservation. 2004;12:53–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2003.07.002

Burns JH, Blomberg SP, Crone EE, Ehrlen J, Knight TM, Pichancourt JB, et al. Empirical tests of life-history evolution theory using phylogenetic analysis of plant demography. J Ecol. 2010;98:334–344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01634.x

Jacquemyn H, Brys R, Hermy M, Willems JH. Long-term dynamics and population viability in one of the last populations of the endangered Spiranthes spiralis (Orchidaceae) in the Netherlands. Biol Conserv. 2007a;134:14–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.07.016

Beever EA, Belant JL. Ecological consequences of climate change. Mechanisms, conservation and management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC; 2012.

del Castillo RF, Trujillo-Argueta S, Rivera-García R, Gómez-Ocampo Z, Mondragón-Chaparro D. Possible combined effects of climate change, deforestation, and harvesting on the epiphyte Catopsis compacta: a multidisciplinary approach. Ecol Evol. 2013;3:3935–3946. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.765

Ackerman JD. Rapid transformation of orchid floras. Lankesteriana. 2014;13:157–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/lank.v13i3.14349

Young A, Boyle T, Brown A. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996;11:413–418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(96)10045-8

Boyce MS, Haridas CV, Lee CT, NCEAS Stochastic Demography Working Group. Demography in an increasingly variable world. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006;21:141–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.11.018

Jongejans E, Jorritsma-Wienk LD, Becker U, Dostál P, Mildén M. de Kroon H. Region versus site variation in the population dynamics of three short-lived perennials. J Ecol. 2010;98:279–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01612.x

Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araujo MB, Sykes MT, Prentice IC. Climate change threat to plant diversity in Europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:8245–8250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409902102

Feehan J, Harley M, van Minnen J. Climate change in Europe. 1. Impact on terrestrial ecosystems and biodiversity. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2009;29:409–421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008066

Kundzewicz ZW, Radziejewski M, Pińskwar I. Precipitation extremes in the changing climate of Europe. Climate Research. 2006;31:51–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/cr031051

Beniston M, Stephenson DB, Christensen OB, Ferro CAT, Frei C, Goyette S, et al. Future extreme events in European climate: an exploration of regional climate model projection. Clim Change. 2007;81:71–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9226-z

Kjellström E, Nikulin G, Hansson U, Strandberg G. 21st century changes in the European climate: uncertainties derived from an ensemble of regional climate model simulation. Tellus. 2011;63A:24–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v63i1.15767

Alsos IG, Ehrich D, Thuiller W, Eidesen PB, Tribsch A, Schönswetter P, et al. Genetic consequences of climate changes for northern plants. Proc Biol Sci. 2012;279:2042–2051. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.2363

Pauli H, Gottfried M, Dullinger S, Abdaladze O, Akhalkatsi M, Alonso JLB, et al. Recent plant diversity changes on Europe’s mountain summits. Science. 2012;336:353–355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1219033

Permesen C. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2006;37:637–669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100

Jump AS, Penuelas J. Running to stand still: adaptation and the response of plant to rapid climate changes. Ecol Lett. 2005;8:1010–1020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00796.x

Nogues-Bravo D, Araujo MB, Errea MP, Martinez-Rica JP. Exposure of global mountain systems to climate warming during the 21st century. Glob Environ Change. 2007;17:420–428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.007

Crawford RMM. Cold climate plants in warmer world. Plant Ecol Divers. 2008;1:285–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17550870802407332

Jongejans E, de Kroon H, Tuljapurkar S, Shea K. Plant populations track rather than buffer climate fluctuations. Ecol Lett. 2010;13:736–743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01470.x

Franks SJ, Weber JJ, Aitken SN. Evolutionary and plastic responses to climate change in terrestrial plant populations. Evol Appl. 2013;7:123–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12112

Totland Ø, Alatalo JM. 2002. Effects of temperature and date of snowmelt on growth, reproduction and flowering phenology in the arctic/alpine herb, Ranunculus glacialis. Oecologia. 2002;33:168–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1028-z

Anderson JT, Panetta AM, Mitchell-Olds T. Evolutionary and ecological responses to anthropogenic climate change. Plant Physiol. 2012;160:1728–1740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.206219

Schaffer WM. Optimal reproductive effort in fluctuating environments. Am Nat. 1974;108:783–790. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/282954

Lande R. Anthropogenic, ecological and genetic factors in extinction and conservation. Res Popul Ecol (Kyoto). 1998;40:259–269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02763457

Morris WF, Pfister CA, Tuljapurkar S, Haridas CV, Boggs CL, Boyce MS, et al. Longevity can buffer plant and animal populations against changing climatic variability. Ecology. 2008;89:19–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/07-0774.1

Heijmans MPD, van der Knaap YAM, Holmgren M, Limpens J. Persistent versus transient tree encroachment of temperate peat bogs: effects of climate warming and drought events. Glob Chang Biol. 2013;19:240–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12202

Shashidhar KS, Arun Kumar AN. Effect of climate change on orchids and their conservation strategies. The Indian Forest. 2009;135:1039–1147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcc.127

Swarts ND, Dixon KW. Terrestrial orchid conservation in the age of extinction. Ann Bot. 2009;104:543–556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp025

Bellgard SE, Williams SE. Response of mycorrhizal diversity to current climatic changes. Diversity. 2011;3:8–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/d3010008

Whigham DF, Willems JH. Demographic studies and life-history strategies of temperate terrestrial orchids as a basis for conservation. In: Dixon KW, Kell SP, Barrett RL, Cribb PJ, editors. Orchid conservation. Kota Kinabalu: Natural History Publications (Borneo); 2003. p. 138–158.

Kull T, Hutchings MJ. A comparative analysis of decline in the distribution ranges of orchid species in Estonia and the United Kingdom. Biol Conserv. 2006;129:31–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.046

Meekers T, Honnay O. Effects of habitat fragmentation on the reproductive success of the nectar-producting orchid Gymnadenia conopsea and the nectarless Orchis mascula. Plant Ecol. 2011;212:1791–1801. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.046

Koopowitz H, Howkins BA. Global climate change is confounding species conservation strategies. Integr Zool. 2012;7:158–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4877.2012.00285.x

Gillman MP, Dodd M. Detection of delayed density dependence in an orchid population. J Ecol. 1998;88:204–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00440.x

Brzosko E. Dynamics of island populations of Cypripedium calceolus in the Biebrza River Valley (north-east Poland). Bot J Linn Soc. 2002;139:67–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8339.2002.00049.x

Pfeifer M, Heinrich W, Jetschke G. Climate, size and flowering history determine flowering pattern of an orchid. Bot J Linn Soc. 2006;151:511–526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2006.00539.x

Jacquemyn H, Vandepitte K, Brys R, Honnay O, Roldán-Ruiz I. Fitness variation and genetic diversity in small, remnant populations of the food deceptive orchid Orchid purpurea. Biol Conserv. 2007;139:203–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.06.015

Hutchings MJ. The population biology of the early spider orchid Ophrys sphegodes Mill. III. Demography over three decades. J Ecol. 2010;98:867–878. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01661.x

Mróz L, Kosiba P. Variation in size-dependent fitness components in terrestrial orchid, Dactylorhiza majalis (RCHB.) Hunt et. Summerh., in relation to environmental factors. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2011;80(2):129–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/asbp.2011.023

Jäkäläniemi A, Tuomi J, Siikamäki P, Kilpia A. Colonization – extinction and patch dynamics of the perennial riparian plant, Silene tatarica. J Ecol. 2011;93:670–680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01001.x

Jacquemyn H, de Meester L, Jongejans E, Honnay O. Evolutionary changes in plant reproductive traits following habitat fragmentation and their consequences for population fitness. J Ecol. 2012;100:76–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01919.x

Pillon Y, Qamaruz-Zaman F, Fay MF, Hendoux F, Piquot Y. Genetic diversity and ecological differentiation in the endangered fen orchid (Liparis loeselii). Conserv Genet. 2007;8:177–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10592-006-9160-7

Chung MY, Nason JD, Chung MG. Effects of population succession on demographic and genetic processes: predictions and tests in the daylily Hemerocallis thunbergii (Liliaceae). Mol Ecol. 2007;16:2816–2829. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03361.x

Vakhrameeva MG, Latarenko IV, Varlygina TI, Torosyan GK, Zagulski MN. Orchids of Russia and adjacent countries (within the border of the former USSR). Ruggell: A.R.G. Ganter; 2008.

Kaźmierczakowa R, Zarzycki K, Mirek Z, editors. Polish red data book of plants. Pteridophytes and flowering plants. 3rd ed. Cracow: Institute of Nature Conservation PAS; 2014.

Bernacki L, Babczyńska-Sendek B, Tokarska-Guzik B, Sobierajska J. Nowe stanowiska Malaxis monophyllos (L.) SWARZ (Orchidaceae) na Wyżynie Śląskiej i terenach sąsiednich. Acta Biologia Silesiana. 1991;19:43–53.

Czylok A, Szymczyk A. Sand quarries as biotopes of rare and critically endangered plant species. In: Mirek Z, Nikiel A, editors. Rare, relict and endangered plants and fungi in Poland. Cracow: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences; 2009. p. 187–192.

Fahrig L. Effect of habitat fragmentation on the extinction threshold: a synthesis. Ecol Appl. 2002;12:346–353. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3060946

Adamowski W. The expansion of Goodyera repens (L.) R. Br. in Western Europe. In: Jackowiak B, Żukowski W, editors. Mechanisms of anthropogenic changes of the plant cover. Poznań: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe; 2000. p. 145–151. (Prace Zakładu Taksonomii Roślin Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu; vol 10).

Jakubska A, Malicka M, Malicki M. New data on the apophytic occurrence of Epipactis helleborine (L.) Crantz and Cephalanthera longifolia (L.) Fritsch in Populus ×canadensis plantation in Lower Silesia (south-western Poland). Biodivers Res Conserv. 2006;1–2:95–97.

Schefferson RP, Kull T, Tali K. Mycorrhizal interactions of orchids colonizing Estonian mine tailing hills. Am J Bot. 2008;95:156–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.95.2.156

Brzosko E, Wróblewska A, Tałałaj I, Adamowski W. Patterns of genetic diversity in Platanthera bifolia (Orchidaceae) with respect to life history traits and recent range expansion. Folia Geobot. 2009;44:131–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12224-009-9033-1

Scheffknecht S, Winkler M, Hülber K, Rosas MM, Hietz P. Seedling establishment of epiphytic orchids in forests and coffee plantations in Central Veracruz, Mexico. J Trop Ecol. 2010;26:93–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266467409990332

Nowak A. Synanthropization of sozophytes in Silesia by allochtonization analysis of the plant communities. In: Mirek Z, Nikiel A, editors. Rare, relict and endangered plants and fungi in Poland. Cracow: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences; 2009. p. 335–343.

Jermakowicz E, Wróblewska A, Brzosko E, Mirski P, Hirse T. Phylogeographical structure of the boreal-montane orchid Malaxis monophyllos as a result of multi-directional gene flow. Bot J Linn Soc. 2015;178:138–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/boj.12268

Wheeler BD, Lambley PW, Geeson J. Liparis loeselii (L.) Rich. in eastern England: constrains on distribution and population development. Bot J Linn Soc. 1998;126:141–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1998.tb02522.x

Reddoch JM, Reddoch AH. Population dynamics and flowering synchrony of Goodyera pubescens (Orchidaceae) in southwestern Quebec, Canada. J Torrey Bot Soc. 2007;34:379–388. http://dx.doi.org/10.3159/1095-5674(2007)134[379:PDAFSO]2.0.CO;2

Blinova IV, Chmielewski FM. Subarctic warming and its influence on the growth of orchid populations in the extreme north-east of Europe (Murmansk Region). Journal Europäischer Orchideen. 2008;40:663–680.

Hultén E, Fries M. Atlas of North European vascular plants north of Tropic of Cancer, vols 1–2. Königstein: Koeltz; 1986.

Zając M. Mountain vascular plants in the Polish lowlands. Cracow: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences; 1996. (Polish Botanical Studies; vol 11).

Holub J, Procházka F. Red list of vascular plants of the Czech Republic – 2000. Preslia. 2000;72:203.

Kålås JA, Viken A, Bakken T. Norwegian red list. Trondheim: Artsdatabanken; 2006.

Pawlikowski P. Rzadkie i zagrożone rośliny naczyniowe torfowisk w dolinie Kunisianki na Pojezierzu Sejneńskim. Fragm Flor Geobot Pol. 2008;15:205–212.

Jermakowicz E. Śleszyński M. Nowe, bogate stanowisko rzadkiego storczyka – wyblinu jednolistnego Malaxis monophyllos (Orchidaceae) w dolinie Rospudy (Puszcza Augustowska). Chrońmy Przyrodę Ojczystą. 2011;67:80–84.

Claessens J, Kleynen J. The flower of the European orchid. Form and function. Jean Claessens & Jacques Kleynen; 2011.

ESRI. ArcGIS Desktop: release 10. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute; 2011.

Tatarenko IV, Kondo K. Seasonal development of annual shoots in some terrestrial orchid from Russia and Japan. Plant Species Biol. 2003;18:43–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-1984.2003.00087.x

StatSoft Inc. STATISTICA user’s guide, version 10. Tulsa, OK; 2011.

Oostermeijer JGB, Hartman Y. Inferring population and metapopulation dynamic of Liparis loeselii from single-census and inventory data. Acta Oecol. 2014;60:30–39.

Hanski I. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature. 1998;396:41–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2014.08.002

Neiland MRM, Wilcock CC. Fruit set, nectar reward, and rarity in the Orchidaceae. Am J Bot. 1998;85:1657–1671. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2446499

Brys R, Jacquemyn H, Hermy M. Pollination efficiency and reproductive patterns in relation to local plant density, population size, and floral display in the rewarding Listera ovata (Orchidaceae). Bot J Linn Soc. 2008;157:713–721. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2008.00830.x

Pellegrino G, Bellusci F. Effects of human disturbance on reproductive success and population viability of Serapis cordigera (Orchidaceae). Bot J Linn Soc. 2014;176:408–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/boj.12204

Parra-Tabla V, Vargas CF, Mangaña-Rueda S, Navarro J. Female and male pollination success of Oncidium ascendens Lindley (Orchidaceae) in two contrasting habitat patches: forest v/s agricultural field. Biol Conserv. 2000;94:335–340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3207(99)00187-1

Whigham DF, O’Neill J. The dynamics of flowering and fruit production in two eastern North American terrestrial orchids, Tipularia discolor and Liparis lilifolia. In: Wells TCE, Willems JH, editors. Population ecology of terrestrial orchids. The Hague: SPB Academic Publishers. 1991. p. 89–101.

Primack R, Stacy E. Cost of reproduction in pink lady’s slipper orchid (Cypripedium acaule, Orchidaceae) an eleven-year experimental study of three populations. Am J Bot. 1998;85:1672–1679. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2446500

Johnson SD, Neal PR, Harder LD. Pollen fates and the limits on male reproductive success in an orchid population. Biol J Linn Soc. 2005;86:175–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00541.x

Rindal E, Søli GEE, Bachmann L. Molecular phylogeny of the fungus gnat family Mycetophilidae (Diptera, Mycetophiliformia). Syst Entomol. 2009;34:524–532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2009.00474.x

Jermakowicz E, Ostrowiecka B, Tałałaj I, Pliszko A, Kostro-Ambroziak A. Male and female reproduction success in natural and anthropogenic populations of Malaxis monophyllos (L.) Sw. (Orchidaceae). Biodiv Res Conserv. 2015;39:37–44.

Mitchell RJ, Karron JD, Holmquist KG, Bell JM. The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns. Funct Ecol. 2004;18:116–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2004.00812.x

Jacquemyn H, Brys R, Honnay O, Hermy M. Effects of coppicing on demographic structure, fruit and seed set in Orchis mascula. Basic Appl Ecol. 2008;9:392–400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2007.05.002

Morecroft MD, Woodward FI. Experiments on the causes of altitudinal differences in the leaf nutrient contents, size and δ13C of Alchemilla alpina. New Phytol. 1996;134:471–479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb04364.x

Greiman J, Dobeš C. High genetic diversity and differentiation in relict lowland populations of Gentianella austriaca (A.J. Kern.) Holub (Gentianaceae). Plant Biol. 2008;2:628–637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2000-16641

Fritz AL, Nilsson LA. 1994. How pollinator-mediated mating varies with population size in plants. Oecologia. 100:451–462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00317867

Aquilar R, Ashworth L, Galetto L, Aizen MA. Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett. 2006;9:968–980. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00927.x

Calvo RN, Horowitz CC. Pollinator limitation, cost of reproduction and fitness in plants: a transition-matrix demographic approach. Am Nat. 1990;136:499–516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/285110

Mattila M, Kuitunen MT. Nutrient versus pollination limitation in Platanthera bifolia and Dactylorhiza incarnata (Orchidaceae). Oikos. 2000;89:360–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890217.x

Vallius E, Arminen S, Salonen V. Are there fitness advantages associated with a large inflorescence in Gymnadenia conopsea ssp. conopsea? [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2016 Mar 10]. Available from: http://www.r-b-o.eu/rbo_public/Vallius_et_al_2006.html

MacArthur RH, Wilson EO. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1967.

Abeli T, Gentili R, Mondoni A, Orsenigo S, Rossi G. Effects of marginality on plant population performance. J Biogeogr. 2014;41:239–249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12215

Lesica P, Allendorf FW. When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? Conserv Biol. 1995;9:753–760. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09040753.x

Levin DA. Local speciation in plants: the rule not the exception. Syst Bot. 1993;18:197–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2419397

Sexton JP, McIntyre PJ, Angert AL, Rice KJ. Evolution and ecology of species range limits. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2009;40:415–436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120317

Wells TCE, Rothery P, Cox R, Bamford S. Flowering dynamics of Orchis morio L. and Herminium monorchis (L.) R.Br. at two sites in eastern England. Bot J Linn Soc. 1998;126:39–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1998.tb02514.x

Olaya-Arenas P, Meléndez-Ackerman EJ, Eglee Pérez M, Tremblay R. Demographic response by small epiphytic orchid. Am J Bot. 2011;98:2040–2048. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1100223

Grzyl A, Kiedrzyński M, Zielińska KM, Rewicz A. The relationship between climatic conditions and generative reproduction of a lowland population of Pulsatilla vernalis the last breath of a relict plant or a fluctuating cycle of regeneration? Plant Ecol. 2014;215:457–466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0316-0




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.3488

Journal ISSN:
  • 2083-9480 (online)
  • 0001-6977 (print; ceased since 2016)
This is an Open Access journal, which distributes its content under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, provided that the content is properly cited.
The journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and aims to follow the COPE’s principles.
The journal publisher is a member of the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association.
The journal content is indexed in Similarity Check, the Crossref initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism.
Publisher
Polish Botanical Society