Changes in vegetation and soil seed bank of meadow after waterlogging caused by Castor fiber

Magdalena Franczak, Bożenna Czarnecka

Abstract


Soil waterlogging is among abiotic stresses that influence species composition and productivity in numerous plant communities. The aim of the study was to find answer to the question of how waterlogging caused by beavers’ activity induces quantitative and qualitative changes of vegetation and soil seed bank levels of variable-moist meadows.

An immediate effect of the waterlogging at the level of vegetation was the decline in species richness and a decrease in the values of the biodiversity index. Water stress inhibited growth and development of plants already present and, primarily, impeded recruitment of new individuals of species characteristic of variable-moist meadows, e.g. Cirsium rivulare, Filipendula ulmaria and Lythrum salicaria, which were replaced by Carex acutiformis. Prolonged waterlogging did not induce equally substantial changes in the soil seed bank as in the vegetation. Both in the waterlogged and control patches, slightly decreased species richness and biodiversity index were recorded. After waterlogging withdrawal, the reserves of the soil seed bank were slightly higher than the initial values. The differences were not statistically significant.

In the waterlogged patch, the qualitative floristic similarity between taxa identified in the soil seed bank and vegetation cover declined, which was evidenced by the value of Jaccard’s index decreasing from 0.46 to 0.36. A reverse relationship was found in control patch, where the value of the similarity index slightly increased from 0.41 to 0.48.


Keywords


waterlogging; vegetation; soil seed bank; variable-moist meadow; Castor fiber

Full Text:

PDF

References


Grime JP. Plant strategies, vegetation processes and ecosystem properties. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons; 2001.

Grootjans AP, van Diggelen R, Wassen MJ, Wiersinga WA. The effects of drainage on groundwater quality and plant species distribution in stream valley meadows. Vegetatio. 1988;75(1–2):37–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00044624

Grootjans AP, Hunnemana H, Verkielb H, van Andel J. Long-term effects of drainage on species richness of a fen meadow at different spatial scales. Basic Appl Ecol. 2005;6(2):185–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2005.01.008

Roy V, Ruel JC, Plamondon AP. Establishment, growth, survival of natural regeneration after clearcutting and drainage on forested wetlands. For Ecol Manage. 2000;129(1–3):253–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00170-X

Sarkkola S, Hokka H, Lacho R, Paivanen J, Penttila T. Stand structural dynamics on drained peatlands dominated by Scots pine. For Ecol Manage. 2005;206(1–3):135–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.064

Blom CWPM. Adaptations to flooding stress: from plant community to molecule. Plant Biol. 1999;1(3):261–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1999.tb00252.x

Lenssen JPM, Menting FBJ, van der Putten WH, Blom WPM. Vegetative reproduction by species with different adaptations to shallow-flooded habitats. New Phytol. 2000;145(1):61–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00557.x

Lenssen JPM, Menting FBJ, van der Putten WH. Plant responses to simultaneous stress of waterlogging and shade: amplified or hierarchical effects? New Phytol. 2003;157(2):281–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00666.x

Kotowski W, van Andel J, van Diggelen R, Hogendorf J. Responses of fen plant species to groundwater level and light intensity. Plant Ecol. 2001;155(2):147–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013214716842

Gibbs J, Greenway H. Mechanisms of anoxia tolerance in plants. I. Growth, survival and anaerobic catabolism. Funct Plant Biol. 2003(1);30:1–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/PP98095

Jackson MB, Colmer TD. Response and adaptation by plants to flooding stress. Ann Bot. 2005;96(4):501–505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci205

Vartapetian BB, Jackson MB. Plant adaptations to anaerobic stress. Ann Bot. 1997;79(A suppl): 3–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a010303

Clevering OA. Effects of litter accumulation and water table on morphology and productivity of Phragmites australis. Wetlands Ecology and Management. 1998;5(4):275–287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008233912279

Edwards AL, Lee DW, Richards JH. Responses to a fluctuating environment: effects of water depth on growth and biomass allocation in Eleocharis cellulosa Torr. (Cyperaceae). Can J Bot. 2003;8:964–975. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/B03-091

Warwick NM, Brock MA. Plant reproduction in temporary wetlands: the effects of seasonal timing, depth, and duration of flooding. Aquat Bot. 2003;77(2):153–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(03)00102-5

Lenssen JPM, van Kleunen M, Fischer M, de Kroon H. Local adaptation of the clonal plant Ranunculus reptans to flooding along a small-scale gradient. J Ecol. 2004;92(4):696–706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00895.x

Mommer L, Visser EJW. Underwater photosynthesis in flooded terrestrial plants: a matter of leaf plasticity. Ann Bot. 2005;96(4):581–889. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci212

Huber H, Jacobs E, Visser EJW. Variation in flooding-induced morphological traits in natural populations of white clover (Trifolium repens) and their effects on plant performance during soil flooding. Ann Bot. 2009;103(2):377–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn149

McDonald AW, Bakker JP, Vegelin K. Seed bank classification and its importance for the restoration of species-rich flood-meadows. J Veg Sci. 1996;7(2):157–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3236315

Bekker RM, Oomes MJM, Bakker JP. The impact of groundwater level on soil seed bank survival. Seed Sci Res.1998;8(3):399–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0960258500004323

Hölzel N, Otte A. The impact of flooding regime on the soil seed bank of flood-meadows. J Veg Sci. 2001;12(2):209–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3236605

Hölzel N, Otte A. Assessing soil seed bank persistence in flood-meadows: the search for reliable traits. J Veg Sci. 2004;15(1):93–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02241.x

Bonis A, Lepart J, Grillas P. Seed bank dynamics and coexistence of annual macrophytes in a temporary and variable habitat. Oikos. 1995;74(1):81–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3545677

Gurnell AM. The hydrogeomorphological effects of beaver dam-building activity. Prog Phys Geogr. 1998;22(2):167–189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/030913398673990613

Rosell F, Bozśer O, Collen P, Parker H. Ecological impact of beavers Castor fiber and Castor canadensis and their ability to modify ecosystems. Mamm Rev. 2005;35(3–4):248–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00067.x

Johnston CA, Naiman RJ. Boundary dynamics of the aquatic–terrestrial interface: the influence of beaver and geomorphology. Landsc Ecol. 1987;1(1):47–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02275265

Westbrook CJ, Cooper DJ, Baker B. Beaver dams and overbank floods influence groundwater – surface water interactions of a Rocky Mountain riparian area. Water Resour Res. 2006;42(6):1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004560

Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos. 1994;69(3):373–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3545850

Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M. Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology. 1997(7);78:1946–1957. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2265935

Wright JP, Jones CG, Flecker AS. An ecosystem engineer, the beaver, increases species richness at the landscape scale. Oecologia. 2002;132(1):96–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0929-1

Wright JP, Jones CG. The concept of organism as ecosystem engineers ten years on: progress, limitations, and challenges. BioScience. 2006;56(3):203–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056%5B0203:TCOOAE%5D2.0.CO;2

Czarnecka B, Janiec B. Abiotic conditions affecting the biodiversity of the “Szum” landscape reserve in Roztocze. Ekologia (Bratislava). 2001;20(4 suppl):207–214.

Czarnecka B, Janiec B. River breaks of Roztocze region as model objects in environmental education. Lublin: Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press; 2002.

Czarnecka B. Plant cover of the Szum River valley (Roztocze, south-east Poland). Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2005;74(1):43–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/asbp.2005.008

Dzwonko Z. Guidebook to phytosociological studies. Poznań: Sorus Press; 2007.

Gross KL. A comparison of method for estimating seed number in the soil. J Ecol. 1990;78(4):1079–1093. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2260953

Thompson K, Bakker JP, Bekker RM. The soil seed banks of north west Europe: methodology, density and longevity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.

Csapodỳ V. Keimlingsbestimmungsbuch der Dikotyledonen. Budapesti: Akademiai Kiado; 1968.

Muller FM. Seedlings of the north-western European lowland. A flora of seedlings. The Hague: Dr W. Junk B.V. Publishers; 1978. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9981-7

Krebs CJ. Ecology. The experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. Warszawa: Polish Scientific Publishers PWN; 2011.

Mirek Z, Piękoś-Mirkowa H, Zając A, Zając M, editors. Flowering plants and pteridophytes of Poland – a checklist. Kraków: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences; 2002. (Biodiversity of Poland; vol 1).

Matuszkiewicz W. The guide for identification of Polish plant communities. Warszawa: Polish Scientific Publishers PWN; 2008.

Nolet BA, Rosell F. Comeback of the beaver Castor fiber: an overview of old and new conservation problems. Biol Conserv. 1998;83(2):165–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00066-9

Hacker SD, Gaines SD. Some implications of direct positive interactions for community species diversity. Ecology. 1997;78(7):1990–2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2265939

Bailey-Serres J, Voesenek LACJ. Flooding stress: acclimations and genetic diversity. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59(1):313–339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092752

Sairam RK, Kumutha D, Ezhilmathi K, Deshmukh PS, Srivastava GC. Physiology and biochemistry of waterlogging tolerance in plants. Biol Plant. 2008;52(3):401–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10535-008-0084-6

Ernst WHO. Ecophysiology of plants in waterlogged and flooded environments. Aquat Bot. 1990;38(1):73–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3770(90)90099-7

Visser EJW, Bögemann GM, van de Steeg HM, Pierik R, Blom PM. Flooding tolerance of Carex species in relation to field distribution and aerenchyma formation. New Phytol. 2000;148(1):93–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00742.x

Kobojek E. Environmental effects of the reintroduction of the beaver (Castor fiber) in the Rawka valley. Prz Geogr. 2005;77:383–396.

Anderson CB, Rosemond AD. Ecosystem engineering by invasive exotic beavers reduces in-stream diversity and enhances ecosystem function in Cape Horn, Chile. Oecologia. 2007;154(1):141–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0757-4

Terwilliger J, Pastor J. Small mammals, ectomycorrhizae and conifer succession in beaver meadows. Oikos. 1999;85(1):83–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3546794

Matus G, Verhagen R, Bekker RM. Soil seed bank and vegetation composition of two fen-meadow stands in the Netherlands. Acta Bot Hung. 2001;43(3):349–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/ABot.43.2001.3-4.10

Falińska K. Seed bank pattern and floristic composition of vegetation patches in a meadow abandoned for 20 years. Fragm Flor Geobot. 2000;45(1–2):91–110.

Bekker RM, Verweij GL, Smith REN, Reine R, Bakker JP, Schneider S. Soil seed bank in European grassland: does land use affect regeneration perspectives? J Appl Ecol. 1997;34(5):1293–1310. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2405239

Grubb PJ. The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biol Rev. 1977;52(1):107–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1977.tb01347.x

Harper JL. Population biology of plants. London: Academic Press; 1977.