Polish Botanical SocietyActa AgrobotanicaActa Agrobot2300-357XPolish Botanical Society742110.5586/aa.7421Original Research PaperPhysiologyDrought Response of Rice in Northeastern Thailand Assessed via Fourier Transform Infrared SpectroscopyDrought Response of Rice in Thailand Analyzed Via FTIRhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6967-5538PhansakPiyapornpphansak@npu.ac.th1*https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0941-3189SiriwongSupatcharee2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8451-8322KanawapeeNantawan1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5815-7954ThumanuKanjana2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2120-2440GunnulaWuttichai1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1798-8006BuensanteaiNatthiya3Division of Biology, Faculty of Science, Nakhon Phanom UniversityMuang Nakhon PhanomThailandSynchrotron Light Research Institute (Public Organization)Muang Nakhon RatchasimaThailandSchool of Crop Production Technology, Institute of Agriculture Technology, Suranaree University of TechnologyMuang Nakhon RatchasimaThailandhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2935-1491Hawrylak-NowakBarbaraUniversity of Life Sciences in LublinPolandTo whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: pphansak@npu.ac.th
Competing Interests. No competing interests have been declared.
Drought isa major constraint in many rainfed areas and affects rice yield. We aimed to characterize the physiological changes in rice in response to drought using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Eighty rice landrace seedlings were subjected to drought in the greenhouse using a PEG 6000. Physiological parameters, including total chlorophyll content, relative water content, electrolyte leakage, and biochemical changes were evaluated. Based on the FTIR results, the landraces were divided into three main groups: tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible. Principal component analysis revealed spectral differences between the control and drought stress treatment groups. Lipid, pectin, and lignin content increased after drought stress. The biochemical components of plants at different drought tolerance levels were also compared. The lipid (CH2 and CH3), lignin (C=C), pectin (C=O), and protein (C=O, N–H) contents were the highest in the drought-tolerant cultivars, followed by the moderately tolerant and susceptible cultivars, respectively. Cultivar 17 and 49 were the most tolerant, and the functional groups were identified and characterized using FTIR. Overall, these results will be useful in selecting parental cultivars for rice breeding programs.
Keywordsricedrought stressdrought tolerancephysiological characteristicsFTIR spectroscopybiochemical changesFunding. This work was supported by the Biodiversity-Based Economy Development Office (BEDO; public organization) under the supervision of the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) under grant number 57/2559.Introduction
Drought is one of the several abiotic stresses that plays a crucial role in reducing plant productivity in many agricultural fields worldwide. The plant drought responses vary and their response mechanisms are complex, which depend on the plant species and the duration of drought (Chukwuma et al., 2017; Prasad et al., 2008). Drought stress causes enormous economic losses in Thailand and elsewhere worldwide, and is predicted to increase in the future because of climate change (Felkner et al., 2009). Drought stress induces molecular and physiological changes in the entire plant, which consecutively affects plant quality and yield (Prasad et al., 2008). Thus, increased knowledge of drought tolerance mechanisms will facilitate effective strategies for crop improvement.
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a major staple food and economic crop worldwide; this is particularly true in Thailand. However, biotic and abiotic stresses hinder rice growth and development. In recent years, the effects of abiotic stress (specifically drought) on rice have increased mainly because of climate change. Rice production has been continually decreasing, especially in the northeastern part of Thailand, which is the leading rice-producing region in the country. In Asia, rice is mostly grown under rain-fed conditions, which is also the case in Thailand; approximately 45% of the total rice cultivation area is not irrigated (Jongdee et al., 1999, 2006; Monkham et al., 2018). Rice grown under rainfed conditions is frequently subjected to drought and is extremely vulnerable to climate change (Monkham et al., 2015), causing rice yields to decline to levels up to 57% lower than the baseline level (Monkham et al., 2015) . Consequently, physiological and biochemical changes can occur in rice plants under drought conditions, which can be investigated by various processes and screening techniques (Chukwuma et al., 2017; Ghaffari et al., 2014; Lenka et al., 2011; Sahebi et al., 2018). Therefore, to improve the economic importance of rice as a staple food source, an increased understanding is required on how rice plants tolerate stress, particularly drought stress that reduces yield. Moreover, the response mechanism of plants to drought must be investigated, which will help identify drought-tolerant rice cultivars.
Plants can defend against certain environmental conditions by altering their metabolism, and these metabolic changes can be identified and analyzed (Y. Zhao et al., 2015). Periods of abiotic stress, such as drought and heat, majorly affect plant physiological processes, resulting in the need for plants to adapt to the new conditions (Arbona et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2003). These types of abiotic conditions affect various plant metabolic activities such as photosynthesis, protein synthesis, plant growth rates, and carbohydrate levels (Hayat et al., 2010, Inuwa & Muhammad, 2018). In rice, these changes affect the metabolic activities associated with rice productivity. Information concerning biochemical modifications within rice plants subjected to environmental stress can be obtained via metabolomic analysis (Chutia & Borah, 2012; Farooq et al., 2008; Farooq et al., 2009; Lenka et al., 2011; Sahebi et al., 2018). Metabolomic (e.g., metabolic fingerprinting) studies are therefore useful, and have been applied in the characterization of different medicinal plants for efficient quality control (J. K. Kumar & Devi Prasad, 2011).
Spectroscopy is a unique technique that can be used to identify biochemical changes in plants; it provides accurate information, is non-destructive and versatile, but requires sample preparation (Afifi & Youssef, 2013; Barbin et al., 2014; McCann et al., 1992, 1997). Specifically, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy can be used to detect conventional changes in compounds related to the agricultural and food industries (Gholizadeh et al., 2014). In plants, initial responses to stress can be evaluated because functional groups within molecules have characteristic absorption frequencies in the infrared (IR) spectrum, which can be measured (J. K. Kumar & Devi Prasad, 2011; X. Zhao et al., 2013). FTIR involves measuring the wavelength and intensity of the absorbed IR light by a sample. The primary function of FTIR is to detect and measure changes in the molecular vibrations of the chemical components within a sample (S. Kumar et al., 2016; Lan et al., 2015; McCann et al., 1992). Absorption wavebands observed in the mid-IR region of the electromagnetic spectrum (between 4,000 and 400 cm−1) are usually associated with the fundamental vibrational modes of a particular functional group or bonds within a molecule. This technique is based on the changes occurring in the dipole moment as a bond vibrates, and can be used as an analytical tool in various fields for the rapid classification and differentiation of various biological species, including plants (Abdelkader et al., 2010; McCann et al., 1997; Thanh et al., 2017; Thumanu et al., 2015), and has specifically been used for characterizing the biochemical components within plant cells (Türker-Kaya & Huck, 2017). FTIR spectroscopy is a powerful tool that can potentially be used in characterizing the drought stress response of rice plants. However, to extract the information from wavebands, a multivariate analysis approach, that is, principal component analysis (PCA), is needed (De Luca et al., 2011; Griesser et al., 2015; Sanchez et al., 2018; Yu, 2012). The IR wavebands of rice plant samples under drought stress conditions compared with that at control conditions exhibited highly specific patterns associated with their chemical components, including lipids, proteins, lignin, pectin, and polysaccharides. The dominant absorption features in the lipid spectrum were found in the 2,800–3,000 cm−1 region, which corresponded to the asymmetric and symmetric properties of CH3 and CH2. The waveband at 1,739 cm−1 represents the C=O esters in pectin. The waveband at 1,700–1,500 corresponds to C=O and N–H from protein amides I and II, respectively. The band at 1,515 cm−1 is ascribed to the stretching vibration of the C=C aromatic skeleton vibrations from lignin, and the area from 1,200 to 900 cm−1 corresponds to the functional groups of C–O–C glycosides, mainly in hemicellulose and polysaccharides. The presence of these biochemical components changes under different conditions; their differences during drought stress conditions and well-watered conditions might help understand plant adaptability under stress conditions (Luz, 2006).
The aim of this study was to characterize the ability and strategy of rice plants to respond to drought stress by analyzing their IR spectral wavebands. Specifically, we compared the variations in the highly specific spectral patterns of chemical components (lipids, proteins, lignin, pectin, and polysaccharides) of rice plants cultivated under drought stress and normal conditions. Moreover, we investigated the physiological responses and biochemical changes in rice using FTIR. Thus, we used FTIR to detect the change in metabolites associated with drought responses and to identify drought-tolerant cultivars, which could be used and employed in rice breeding programs in the future.
Material and MethodsPlant Material
The seeds of 80 rice cultivars collected from different provinces in northeastern Thailand were used in this study. Seeds were collected from rice landraces, which are commonly grown in the northeastern region of Thailand. CT9993, a drought-tolerant cultivar obtained from Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand, and KDML105, a drought-susceptible Thai jasmine rice cultivar obtained from the Nakhon Ratchasima Rice Seed Center, were included as reference cultivars for comparison. The cultivar names and their collection locations are listed in Table 1.
List of 80 rice cultivars collected from the northeastern region of Thailand (Phansak et al., 2021).
Cultivar No.
Cultivar name
Location
1
Doi Won
Mukdahan
2
E-Tum
Sakon Nakhon
3
Mae-Peung
Mukdahan
4
E-Kao
Sakon Nakhon
5
Pao-Mia
Mukdahan
6
Lao-Tak
Sakon Nakhon
7
Pra-In
Nakhon Phanom
8
San-Pa-Tong-Door
Nakhon Phanom
9
Khao-Kam
Mukdahan
10
Jao-Deang
Sakon Nakhon
11
Lhong-Ma
Mukdahan
12
Tab-Mouy- Kao
Sakon Nakhon
13
Luang-Khaew
Nakhon Phanom
14
Ma-Yom
Sakon Nakhon
15
Hom-Door
Mukdahan
16
Hang-Yee
Sakon Nakhon
17
Kham-Phai
Sakon Nahon
18
E-Khew-Non-Tung
Mukdahan
19
Door-Deang
Sakon Nakhon
20
Nheaw-Jao (PW6060-22-373)
Sakon Nakhon
21
Khab-Yang
Sakon Nakhon
22
Luang-Yai 75-4-62
Sakon Nakhon
23
Nang-Whan 60-7-91
Sakon Nakhon
24
Hang-Yee 563-2-20
Sakon Nakhon
25
Khee-Tom-Dam
Sakon Nakhon
26
Nang-Suan
Sakon Nakhon
27
Mark-Bid
Sakon Nakhon
28
Jao-Sam-Deuan
Nakhon Ratchasima
29
Hin-Son
Nakhon Ratchasima
30
Khao-Hom
Petchaboon
31
Luang-Thong
Udon Thani
32
Kee-Tom-Hang-Nark
Udon Thani
33
E-Lhong-Ma
Udon Thani
34
Pa-Ma
Udon Thani
35
Hang-Yee 3908
Sakon Nakhon
36
Jao-Khao
Udon Thani
37
Kee-Tom-Nark
Udon Thani
38
Jao-Loy
Udon Thani
39
Tom-Door
Udon Thani
40
Khao-Yai
Udon Thani
41
Jao-Rein-Thong
Udon Thani
42
Kee-Tom-Pun
Udon Thani
43
Kao-Sa-Mart
Kalasin
44
Rark-Phai
Sakon Nakhon
45
Leb-Mar
Sakon Nakhon
46
Kee-Thom
Sakon Nakhon
47
Kab-Mark
Sakon Nakhon
48
Kan-Tarn
Sakon Nakhon
49
Hang-Nark
Sakon Nakhon
50
Kan-Tarn
Sakon Nakhon
51
E-Tam
Sakon Nakhon
52
Hom-Thung
Sakon Nakhon
53
Mark-Yom
Loei
54
Khao-Haw
Sakon Nakhon
55
Ka-set-Door
Sakon Nakhon
56
Hom-Nang-Nuan
Kalasin
57
Hom-Heud
Sakon Nakhon
58
Hom-Dor
Sakon Nakhon
59
Hom-Nang-Nuan
Nakhon Phanom
60
Kao-Hom
Nakhon Ratchasima
61
Hom-Nang-Nuan
Sakon Nakhon
62
Hom-Pae
Khon Kaen
63
Hom-Suan
Kamphaengpet
64
Kee-Tom-Dam
Sakon Nakhon
65
Leb-Ma
Sakon Nakhon
66
E-Deang-Noi
Sakon Nakhon
67
Sam-Ruang
Sakon Nakhon
68
Kra-dard
Sakon Nakhon
69
Sam-Deuan-Hang
Nakhon Phanom
70
Luang-Boon-Ma
Udon Thani
71
Jao-Door
Nongbualamphu
72
Do-Yuan
Nongbualamphu
73
Khaen-Pra-Doo
Sukhothai
74
Door-Noi
Yasothon
75
E-Tok
Yasothon
76
Khao-Soi
Kalasin
77
Door-Sa-Kon
Yasothon
78
Ma-Fai
Sakon Nakhon
79
Ma-Prang
Sakon Nakhon
80
E-Tang
Sakon Nakhon
Plant Cultivation and Drought Treatment
All the rice seeds used were cleaned with 0.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) taken in a 50-mL plastic tube and shaken for 10 min. The seeds were washed with distilled water five times and subsequently soaked in sterilized water overnight. Thereafter, the seeds were placed in plastic boxes covered with moistened paper and allowed to germinate for 3 days until the radicle emerged. After germination, the seeds were transferred to a custom-made seedling float system with nylon mesh, and each seedling was grown in Yoshida’s nutrient solution medium (Yoshida et al., 1976) contained in plastic tubs; the dimensions of the plastic tub were 29 × 41 × 10 cm. Fifteen rice plants were planted per container. The seedlings were divided into two groups: drought and well-watered (control). The experiment was conducted using a randomized complete block design (RCBD). The treatment for each rice cultivar was replicated thrice, with one plant per replicate, and the rice seedlings were maintained in water at 28 °C for 3 days. Yoshida’s nutrient solution medium (Yoshida et al., 1976), which provides nutrients required for proper plant growth and development, was added 4 days after the seedling transplantation into each plastic trayand the nutrient solution was changed every 4 days. Treatments were initiated during the vegetative stage of development, and drought stress conditions were imposed using 20% polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000. The control plants received only Yoshida’s nutrient solution without PEG 6000 (well-watered conditions) throughout the experimental period, and a pH of 5.0 was maintained in both the control and drought stress treatments. The rice plants were grown for 21 days under greenhouse conditions, during which PEG 6000 was applied to the treatment plants to induce drought for 10 days. After 10 days, all plants under drought and control (well-watered) conditions were scored for their tolerance, after which they were harvested (the third leaf from the top down) to evaluate their physiological characteristics [i.e., total chlorophyll content, relative water content (RWC), electrolyte leakage (EL)] and metabolic biochemical changes.
Measurement of Chlorophyll Concentration
After 10 days of treatment, all plants from both the drought and control conditions were collected and placed on ice. Total chlorophyll content was estimated according to the method proposed by Aron (1949), with slight modifications. Leaf sample (1 g) was cut into small pieces and soaked in 10 mL of 80% acetone for 3 days under dark conditions, after which their final volume was recorded. The absorbance of each extract was recorded at 645 and 663 nm using a spectrophotometer (Halo RB-10; Dynamica Scientific; Livingston, UK), with 80% acetone used as a blank control. The chlorophyll concentration was expressed as milligrams per gram of tissue fresh weight (FW) and calculated as follows:
where A645 and A663 represent the absorbance of the chlorophyll extract at 645 and 663 nm, respectively, V is the total extract volume (mL), and W is the fresh leaf weight (g).
Measurement of Electrolyte Leakage
EL was measured in the second uppermost fully expanded leaf of all rice cultivars. For this method, 100 mg fresh rice leaf samples were cut into pieces of 5 mm in length and transferred to a test tube containing 10 mL distilled deionized water. The tubes were covered with plastic caps and placed in a water bath at 32 °C for 2 hr. The initial electrical conductivity of the sample (EC1) was measured after 2 hr of incubation using an electrical conductivity meter (InLab 741; Mettler-Toledo, Analytical; Schwerzenbach, Switzerland). The samples were then incubated in a 100 °C water bath for 45 min to completely kill the tissues and release all electrolytes. The samples were subsequently incubated at room temperature, and the final electrical conductivity (EC2) was measured. EL was ultimately expressed using the formula:
EL=(EC1∕EC2)×100,
as described by Dionisio-Sese and Tobita (1998).
Calculations of Relative Water Content
To calculate the RWC, flag leaves of rice plants subjected to drought and control conditions were used. After they were cut at the base of the lamina, the leaf samples were immediately sealed in plastic bags and transferred to the laboratory. The leaf samples were then cut in the middle (approximately 3 cm in length); to determine the FW, leaf samples were weighed within 2 hr after excision. Turgid weights were obtained after the leaf samples were submerged in distilled water at room temperature (approximately 25 °C) for 16 to 18 hr. After being submerged, the leaf samples were carefully and quickly blotted dry with tissue paper prior to obtaining their turgid weight. Finally, the leaf samples were oven-dried at 65 °C for 24 hr, after which their dry weights were obtained. The RWC was calculated according to the equation provided by Schonfeld et al. (1988):
RWC=FW−DWTW−W×100,
where FW is the fresh weight, DW is the dry weight, and TW is the turgid weight of a leaf sample.
FTIR Spectroscopy Analysis
All rice leaf samples subjected to FTIR spectroscopy were prepared according to the methods described by Thanh et al. (2017), with slight modifications. Leaf samples of both drought-treated and untreated rice plants were collected 10 days after imposing drought conditions. The leaf samples were first hot-air oven-dried at 60 °C for 72 hr to remove water. The dried leaf samples were then ground to a fine powder using a mortar and pestle for analysis, with three replicates. FTIR spectroscopy was subsequently performed via single-reflection attenuated total reflectance (ATR) using a diamond crystal (Buensanteai et al., 2012). FTIR (Tensor 27, Bruker Optics; Ettlingen, Germany) spectroscopy measurements were conducted at the Suranaree University of Technology (Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand). A background spectrum of air was collected before scanning each sample to check the cleanness of the crystal and to ensure no interference from the surface residues. FTIR analyses were performed in the mid-IR range of 4,000–800 cm−1, with a spectral resolution of 4 cm−1 and 64 scans.
The spectra of each sample was analyzed using PCA to identify the different biochemical components present within each sample. The FTIR spectra were preprocessed by calculating the second derivative, followed by vector normalization with extended multiplicative signal correction (EMSC). The second derivative was subsequently corrected for baseline effects and linear wavenumber-dependent effects, after which vector normalization was performed for standardization based on the total amount of biomass. Preprocessing analysis was performed to increase the accuracy of the determined waveband positions. PCA was performed for the spectral ranges of 3,000–2,800 cm−1 and 1,800–900 cm−1, which together covered the regions of lipids, proteins, and polysaccharides, and the “true” fingerprint region. The waveband assignments are presented in Table 2. The results were presented as score plots using the Unscrambler X 10.5 software (Camo Analytics; Oslo, Norway). Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was performed using OPUS 7.2 software (Bruker Optics), with second-derivative calculations and vector normalization corresponding to the fingerprint region of each spectral data. A dendrogram was generated using Ward’s algorithm, with interspectral distances and spectral distances calculated as D values (Thanh et al., 2017; Thumanu et al., 2017).
Waveband assignments of the plant FTIR spectra (Thanh et al., 2017; Thumanu et al., 2017).
Wavenumber (cm−1)
Functional groups
1,730
C=O ester of lignin and pectin
1,700–1,600
Amide I components resulting from the stretching of C=O and C–N and the N–H bending from antiparallel pleated sheets and beta turns of proteins
1,600–1,500
Amide II resulting from N–H bending and C–N stretching
1,513
C=C aromatic skeleton vibration from lignin
1,470
Asymmetric CH2 and CH3 bending from lipids
1,340
Symmetric CH2 and CH3 bending from lipids
1,240
C=O stretching of hemicellulose and lignin
1,200–1,000
C–O–C glycoside ether mainly from hemicellulose and polysaccharides
Statistical Analysis
The means and standard deviations were computed for three replicates per treatment group. The data were analyzed using the least significant difference (LSD) test at p = 0.05, and the t test was performed using SPSS software (version 16.0; SPSS; Chicago, USA). Error bars expressing ± standard deviations were computed, and significant differences were based on comparisons of the means via Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at p = 0.05.
ResultsEffects of Drought on the Total Chlorophyll Concentration
The results showed that the total chlorophyll concentration of the rice plants subjected to drought stress either increased or decreased depending on the cultivar and the level of tolerance. The effect of drought stress on total leaf chlorophyll concentration was significant (p < 0.05; Table 3 and Figure 1C). Based on the results, all 80 rice cultivars were divided into three groups: susceptible, moderately tolerant, and tolerant. The tolerant cultivars, such as cultivar No. 14, 17, 18, and 49, presented the highest chlorophyll concentration (3.51 mg g−1 FW) under drought conditions, which is in agreement with the results of the drought-tolerant of reference cultivar CT9993, and were therefore classified as tolerant. Cultivars such as No. 55, which is classified as susceptible, had significantly lowest total chlorophyll concentration (1.24 mg g−1 FW).
Effects of Drought on Electrolyte Leakage
EL in the leaves of the drought stress-treated plants did not decrease significantly. However, based on their degree of tolerance, the 80 rice cultivars were divided into three groups: susceptible, moderately tolerant, and tolerant (Table 3 and Figure 1A). The highest EL occurred in cultivar Nos. 61 and 62 (EL of 57.44% and 52.03%, respectively); these cultivars were thus categorized as susceptible. Cultivar Nos. 32 and 49 presented the lowest EL (6.49% and 4.97%, respectively), and thus were designated as tolerant.
Effects of Drought on the Relative Water Content
The RWC did not change significantly in every cultivar in response to drought stress during the seedling stage (Table 3 and Figure 1B). However, for some cultivars, the effects of drought significantly (p < 0.05) affected RWC. Compared with that of the control plants, the leaf RWC of drought-stressed plants decreased significantly. For example, cultivar Nos. 14 and 17 presented substantial reductions in RWC under drought stress conditions at the seedling stage, with values of 67.41% and 45.32%, respectively. Cultivar Nos. 22 and 26 presented the greatest RWC values of 74.18% and 71.22%, respectively. The leaf RWC results were in accordance with the biochemical indices under drought stress conditions. The RWC of plants that are highly tolerant to drought stress is relatively high.
Comparisons of the means of measured physiological traits, i.e., electrolyte leakage, relative water content, and total chlorophyll content, of plants under control conditions and drought stress conditions.
Group
Subgroup
Total chlorophyll concentration (mg/g FW)
Electrolyte leakage (%)
Relative water content (%)
Treatment:
All cultivars under different drought conditions
Control conditions
1.98**
2.46**
96.78**
Drought conditions
2.40**
15.18**
66.28**
Drought-tolerant group:
All cultivars under drought conditions
Moderately tolerant
2.38a
14.51a
66.08b
Susceptible
2.94b
24.47b
57.72a
Tolerant
2.24a
12.86a
69.53b
Cultivar:
Moderately tolerant cultivars under drought conditions
12
1.68a
7.32abc
71.03cdefghi
16
3.12i
14.64abcde
70.34cdefghi
20
2.08abcdefg
14.50abcde
54.70abcd
28
2.51gh
14.48abcde
65.90cdefgh
31
2.23cdefg
6.62abc
57.02abcdef
33
3.51j
14.49abcde
53.91abc
34
2.93i
15.53bcde
61.30bcdefg
36
1.75ab
6.99abc
60.37bcdefg
40
2.27defg
23.29ef
56.19abcde
45
2.17bcdefg
6.14ab
70.54cdefghi
50
2.30efg
7.15abc
46.20ab
51
2.43fgh
17.65cde
75.38ghi
52
2.05abcdefg
7.74abc
79.61hi
57
2.24defg
20.73def
64.59cdefgh
58
2.26defg
14.03abcde
68.54cdefgh
60
1.64a
8.46abc
62.01bcdefg
71
1.83abcd
6.78abc
83.05i
72
1.85abcde
14.71abcde
72.57efghi
81 (KDML105)
3.65j
6.04ab
56.65abcdef
Susceptible cultivars under drought conditions
22
2.69cd
20.24ab
74.18c
26
3.71e
18.10ab
71.22c
29
2.87cd
6.45a
64.05bc
38
3.09de
16.85ab
53.05b
39
3.75e
22.97b
65.28bc
44
5.20f
39.31c
32.91a
53
1.69ab
10.27ab
64.34bc
55
1.24a
10.02ab
61.82bc
56
2.10bc
15.43ab
66.53bc
61
2.65cd
57.44d
56.08b
62
3.35de
52.03d
25.49a
Tolerant cultivars under drought conditions
1
0.83a
7.93abcd
74.31cdefg
7
2.04bcdef
7.72abc
69.37bcdefg
14
2.53defgh
10.58abcdef
67.41bcdefg
17
3.51k
19.06hi
45.32a
18
2.69fghi
26.18j
80.65fg
32
2.28cdefg
6.49bc
65.14bcdefg
49
2.32cdefg
4.97a
78.83efg
67
2.43defg
10.14abcdef
78.99efg
70
2.62efgh
15.65fghi
77.06defg
73
2.86ghij
11.62bcdef
70.64bcdefg
76
2.16cdef
11.95bcdef
77.89efg
82 (CT9993)
2.03bcdef
8.23abcd
75.41defg
Means with different asterisks and letters within the same column are significantly different at p < 0.05. The asterisks (**) indicate significant differences between the control and drought treatments for all cultivars, as determined by the Student’s t test. Means with different letters indicate significant differences between drought tolerance groups (moderately tolerant, susceptible, tolerant) and cultivars within each tolerance group (p < 0.05) according to DMRT.
Comparisons of the means of physiological traits, i.e., electrolyte leakage (A), relative water content (B), and total chlorophyll concentration (C) of 80 rice cultivars divided into three groups: susceptible, moderately tolerant, and tolerant.
FTIR Spectroscopy of the Biochemical Changes in Rice
The PCA revealed distinct separation between the control and drought stress treatment groups, which corresponded to the biochemical variation and intensity between the rice samples in the different treatments (Figure 2A, Figure 3A, Figure 4A). The first principal component (PC1) was used to characterize the maximum percentage of spectral variation. PC1 from the three drought stress treatment groups (susceptible, moderately tolerant, and tolerant) accounted for 84%, 85%, and 80% of the total variation, respectively. The spectral features of the loading plot corresponded to the differences between the drought stress treatment group and the control group, as revealed by PCA. The spectral features that separated the control group from the drought stress treatment group were associated with the CH2 and CH3 stretching of lipids, the C=O stretching of pectin, and the C–O stretching of lignin (Figure 2B, Figure 3B, Figure 4B). The second-derivative FTIR spectra of the control and drought stress treatment groups are shown in Figure 2C, Figure 3C, Figure 4C.
(A) Representative PCA score plot of susceptible plants under drought stress conditions and control conditions. (B) Loading plot of PC1 from the PCA. (C) Second-derivative-transformed spectra. The obtained spectra were analyzed in the regions of 3,000–2,800 cm−1 and 1,800–900 cm−1.
(A) Representative PCA score plot of moderately tolerant plants under drought stress conditions and control conditions. (B) Loading plot of PC1 from the PCA. (C) Second-derivative-transformed spectra. The obtained spectra were analyzed in the regions of 3,000–2,800 cm−1 and 1,800–900 cm−1.
(A) Representative PCA score plot of tolerant plants under drought stress conditions and control conditions. (B) Loading plot of PC1 from the PCA. (C) Second-derivative-transformed spectra. The obtained spectra were analyzed in the regions of 3,000–2,800 cm−1 and 1,800–900 cm−1.
All drought stress treatment groups presented reductions in biochemical components based on CH2 and CH3 stretching from lipids (3,000–2,800 cm−1), C=O stretching from pectin (1,740 cm−1), and C=C stretching from lignin (1,515 cm−1). Moreover, all drought stress treatment groups presented high spectral intensity at wavebands 1,340, 1,280, 1,107, and 962 cm−1, which are associated with the OH and CH stretching of cellulose or hemicellulose, and the CH2 stretching of lignin. To evaluate the changes in the plant biochemical components with different levels of tolerant response to drought stress, plants in the susceptible, moderately tolerant, and tolerant groups were compared and analyzed. PCA revealed separation of each treatment group, with a total variance of 83% (PC1 = 73%, PC2 = 10%), which indicated distinct division between the susceptible, moderately tolerant, and tolerant groups of plants (Figure 5A). PCA also revealed a clear separation between the tolerant and susceptible groups according to the loading plot (Figure 5B), which was attributed to the spectral features of the tolerant group associated with the CH2 and CH3 stretching of lipids, the C=O stretching of amide I protein, and the C=C stretching of lignin. Figure 5C shows the average second-derivative spectra by comparing the intensity of spectral features associated with each biochemical component that changed under drought conditions compared with the control conditions. Compared with the moderately tolerant and tolerant groups, the susceptible group exhibited high-intensity absorption at wavebands 1,342, 1,280, and 960 cm−1, which are associated with cellulose and hemicellulose. However, compared with the moderately tolerant and susceptible groups, the tolerant group exhibited higher intensity of CH2 stretching of lipids (2,920 and 2,854 cm−1), C=C stretching of lignin (1,515 cm−1), and C=O stretching of amide I protein (1,650 cm−1). The integrated area under the peaks can be used to compare quantitative differences in peak height; thus, the peak areas of the different drought stress groups were compared to detect significant differences (Figure 5D). The biochemical responses of the plants depend on the level of drought stress tolerance. In addition, HCA was used to classify the similarities between groups of samples. Therefore, an HCA dendrogram was constructed using averaged spectra of the susceptible, moderately tolerant, and tolerant treatment groups. HCA was performed using Ward’s algorithm, second-derivative transformation (9-point smoothing), and vector normalization for the regions of 3,000–2,800 and 1,800–900 cm−1. HCA resulted in the division of the spectra into three groups, similar to the results shown in the PCA score plot (Figure 5E). In the dendrogram, the tolerance frequencies were the most distant within branch A, corresponding to waveband assigned at 2,920, 2,850, and 1,159 cm−1 from the loading plot of PC1, whereas the spectra from the susceptible and moderately tolerant groups clustered closely together and resulted from the wavebands at 1,342, 1,282, and 964 cm−1, which are shown on branches B1 and B2.
(A) Representative PCA score plot of susceptible, moderately tolerant and tolerant plants under drought stress conditions. (B) Loading plot of PC1 from the PCA. (C) second-derivative-transformed spectra. (D) Comparisons of the integrated areas of the biochemical components of plants from each drought stress condition. (E) HCA (via Ward’s algorithm) results after second-derivative transformation and vector normalization of the spectra. The obtained spectra were analyzed in the regions of 3,000–2,800 cm−1 and 1,800–900 cm−1.
Discussion
This study investigated the response of different rice cultivars to drought stress based on their physiological and biochemical traits, that is, total chlorophyll, EL, RWC, and FTIR absorption data. PEG was used to evaluate cell membrane permeability and stability, and to evaluate drought tolerance (Amini et al., 2014; Hellal et al., 2018; Sultan et al., 2014). The electroconductivity of aqueous media containing rice leaf discs that were previously water-stressed by exposing to a PEG solution was measured. The results of PEG experiments have been shown to be affected by various factors based on membrane permeability, such as osmotic adjustment, wax content, changes in cytoplasmic lipids, EL, RWC, leaf surface, and thickness of the cuticular layer and cell walls (Bayoumi et al., 2008; Fraser et al., 1990; Premachandra et al., 1992).
Leaf tissue parameters, including RWC, EL, and total chlorophyll concentration, were used as indicators of drought stress in different rice cultivars (Cha-um et al., 2010; Chutia & Borah, 2012; Kanawapee et al., 2012; Shereen et al., 2019; Sovannarun et al., 2019). The RWC and chlorophyll concentrations were comparable to those of the control during drought stress at the seedling stage. Studies have shown that EL within plant leaf tissue increases with increased leaf water deficit (Khan et al., 2017; S. Kumar et al., 2014; Larkunthod et al., 2018). Drought stress strongly affects both plant function and membrane structure, severely hindering various cellular functions, such as adjusting from the liquid-crystalline phase to the gel phase and fusion, and increasing cell permeability (Ferrari-Iliou et al., 1984; Vaezi et al., 2010; Zare et al., 2011). Our results indicate that EL reflects drought stress-induced changes in cellular metabolism and cell membrane permeability. Overall, the results showed that the EL within rice tissue can reflect the membrane leakage caused by drought stress, and thus, this technique can be used to provide useful information to describe the behavior of rice plant tissues in response to drought stress and other abiotic stresses (Carpita et al., 1979; Lu & Neumann, 1998).
We used FTIR spectroscopy to analyze the changes in the biochemical components in the leaves of rice plants under drought stress. Thus, we analyzed the differences in macromolecules in 80 different rice landraces at a high spatial resolution. According to the methods of Thumanu et al. (2015) and Nikalje et al. (2019), we combined FTIR and PCA to evaluate the chemical nature of the leaves of different varieties. The FTIR technique can classify plant species based on their biochemical contents (Legner et al., 2018; Qiu et al., 2014) and can also be used to determine plant responses to chemicals or the environment (Fan et al., 2016; Westworth et al., 2019). Thus, the FTIR technique can be used to classify plants as susceptible, moderately tolerant, or tolerant to drought. Moreover, FTIR could be used to identify and differentiate the biochemical compounds among the three groups, and calculate the correlations between the biochemical contents and drought stress tolerance. In a previous study, PCA revealed that leaf treatment with bacterial strain D604 caused spectral changes in epidermal and mesophyll tissue; treatment with D604 caused spectral differences from epidermal and mesophyll tissue, and altered both cell wall thickness and protein structure. Species of the plant growth-promoting genus Bacillus produce elicitor molecules that affect chili plants, altering their structure, and eliciting physiological changes in plant growth and development (Thumanu et al., 2017).
FTIR spectroscopy is a useful tool for determining the structure of known components, their spectral intensity, and their chemical constituent groups (McCann et al., 1992). Previous studies have shown that the protein-based wavebands are often localized between 1,800 and 1,500 cm−1 (Surewicz et al., 1993); the wavebands adjacent to 3,370 cm−1 are associated with the O–H group of alcohols, whereas the 2,800–3,000 cm−1 region corresponds to lipids. Polysaccharide wavebands are located at 438–709 cm−1, and C=O groups can be detected at 1,744 cm−1, which represent lipids and fatty acid esters. In the present study, the FTIR data revealed significant shifts and crucial differences in reflectance intensity in the spectra of rice leaves.
Water stress can induce physiological and biochemical responses in plants. In the present study, rice plants under well-watered and drought stress conditions presented differences in the biochemical components associated with metabolites and metabolic responses. Metabolite levels can increase under drought stress because of the increased degradation of other metabolites. Increase in sugar content (corresponding to wavebands 1,342, 1,280, and 960 cm−1) and decrease in lipids and protein (corresponding to wavebands 2,920 and 2,854 cm−1) were detected in rice plants under drought stress conditions. These results are similar to those of other studies that investigated plant response to stress conditions caused by membrane injury, protein degradation, and enzyme inactivation, resulting in the induction of oxidative stress. Under drought stress conditions, plants can synthesize sugars, sugar alcohols, and other carbohydrates; therefore, soluble carbohydrates may play a role in osmotic regulation (Asaf et al., 2017).
However, in plants under drought and heat stress conditions, the expression of genes involved in the defense pathway is activated, and sucrose and other sugars such as maltose and glucose accumulate (Rizhsky et al., 2004). Moreover, drought stress can affect plant cell membranes. Lipids are an important component of plant membranes and are affected by drought stress. In plants, oxidative stress caused by water stress can produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as O2, H2O2, and OH radicals. Increased ROS levels result in increased levels of malondialdehyde (MDA). MDA can attack membrane lipids, leading to increased lipid peroxidation, which can act as a marker for membrane lipid peroxidation, resulting in decreased membrane stability (Abid et al., 2018; Fathi & Tari, 2016). Additionally, overproduction of MDA due to increased lipid peroxidation can result in protein degradation and DNA fragmentation, which can cause plant cell death (Hussain et al., 2018; Sharma et al., 2012; Xie et al., 2019).
Conclusion
The results of our experiments can provide meaningful data for genetic studies on rice. After drought stress was imposed on all 80 cultivars, they were assigned to one of the following three groups based on their chlorophyll content, EL, and RWC: susceptible, moderately tolerant, and tolerant groups. Additionally, our results suggest that the biochemical components of rice plants varied after imposing drought stress conditions. Differences in the biochemical components of the rice leaves were detected when the susceptible, moderately tolerant, and tolerant cultivars were compared. This variation may be associated with the adaptive response of plants to severe environmental disturbances. Additionally, we demonstrated that FTIR spectroscopy can be used to explain the primary mechanisms governing the adaptive response via intensities of spectral peaks that correspond to specific biochemical components within plant leaves. Thus, these attributes can be used as screening tools for drought tolerance in rice plants and for identifying tolerant rice cultivars for parental selection in rice breeding programs.
Acknowledgments
We wish to express our special gratitude to the Sakon Nakhon Rice Research Center, Thailand, for providing the rice seeds. We also thank the Synchrotron Light Research Institute (SLRI) for providing all the facilities required for this research. Finally, we would like to specially thank Scott Dworak, MSc and Aimee Sheer Hyten, for their assistance with English editing and proofreading.
ReferencesAbdelkaderA. F.HassaneinR. A.Abo-AlyM. M.AttiaM. S.BakirE. M.Screening the bio-safety of wheat produced from pretreated grains to enhance tolerance against drought using physiological and spectroscopic methods20104818271835https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.015AbidM.AliS.QiL. K.ZahoorR.TianZ.JiangD.SniderJ. L.DaiT.Physiological and biochemical changes during drought and recovery periods at tillering and jointing stages in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)201884615https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21441-7AfifiA. A.YoussefR. A.Fourier transform infrared spectometry study on early stage of salt stress in jojoba plant201310419731981AminiH.ArzaniA.KaramiM.Effect of water deficiency on seed quality and physiological traits of different safflower genotypes201438271282https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-1308-22ArbonaV.ManziM.de OllasC.Gómez-CadenasA.Metabolomics as a tool to investigate abiotic stress tolerance in plants20131448854911https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14034885AronD.Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts194924115https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1AsafS.KhanA. L.KhanM. A.ImranQ. M.YunB. W.LeeI. J.Osmoprotective functions conferred to soybean plants via inoculation with Sphingomonas sp. LK11 and exogenous trehalose2017205135145https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2017.08.009BarbinD. F.FelicioA. L. S. M.SunD. W.NixdorfS. L.HirookaE. Y.Application of infrared spectral techniques on quality and compositional attributes of coffee: An overview2014612332https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.01.005BayoumiT. Y.ManalH. E.MetwaliE. M.Application of physiological and biochemical indices as a screening technique for drought tolerance in wheat genotypes2008723412352https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.01.005BuensanteaiN.ThumanuK.SompongM.AthinuwatD.PrathuangwongS.The FTIR spectroscopy investigation of the cellular components of cassava after sensitization with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, Bacillus subtilis20126603610CarpitaN.SabularseD.MonfezinosD.DelmerD. P.Determination of the pore size of cell walls of living plant cells197920511441147https://doi.org/10.1126/science.205.4411.1144Cha-umS.YooyongwechS.SupaibulwatanaK.Water deficit stress in the reproductive stage of four indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes201042533873398ChukwumaC. O.MatthewA. E. M.Habib-ur-RehmanA.GilesN. J.Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic analysis of maize (Zea mays) subjected to progressive drought reveals involvement of lipids, amides and carbohydrates20171610611066https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2017.15918ChutiaJ.BorahS. P.Water stress effects on leaf growth and chlorophyll content but not the grain yield in traditional rice (Oryza sativa Linn.) genotypes of Assam, India II. Protein and proline status in seedlings under PEG induced water stress20123971980https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2012.37115De LucaM.TerouziW.IoeleG.KzaiberF.OussamaA.OliverioF.TaulerR.RagnoG.Derivative FTIR spectroscopy for cluster analysis and classification of Morocco olive oils201112411131118https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.07.010Dionisio-SeseM. L.TobitaS.Antioxidant responses of rice seedlings to salinity stress199813519https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00025-9FanC. H.ChangM.ZhangY. C.GaoY. L.Ftir analysis of secondary abiotic stress response of Calendula officinalis seedlings to lead and cadmium in multi-contaminated loess201636824422446FarooqM.BasraS. M. A.WahidA.AhmadN.SaleemB. A.Improving the drought tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by exogenous application of salicylic acid2009195237246https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2009.00365.xFarooqM.BasraS. M. A.WahidA.CheemaZ. A.CheemaM. A.KhaliqA.Physiological role of exogenously applied glycinebetaine to improve drought tolerance in fine grain aromatic rice (Oryza sativa L.)2008194325333https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00323.xFathiA.TariD. B.Effect of drought stress and its mechanism in plants20161016https://doi.org/10.3126/ijls.v10i1.14509FelknerJ.TazhibayevaK.TownsendR.Impact of climate change on rice production in Thailand200999205210https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.2.205Ferrari-IliouR.Pham-ThiA. T.Vieira da SilvaJ.Effects of water stress on the lipid and fatty acid composition of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) chloroplasts198462219224https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1984.tb00374.xFraserT. E.SilkW. K.RostT. L.Effects of low water potential on cortical cell length in growing regions of maize roots199093648651https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.93.2.648GhaffariA.GharechahiJ.NakhodaB.SalekdehG. H.Physiology and proteome responses of two contrasting rice mutants and their wild type parent under salt stress conditions at the vegetative stage20141713144https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2013.07.014GholizadehH.NaserianA. A.XinH.ValizadehR.TahmasbiA. M.YuP.Detecting carbohydrate molecular structural makeup in different types of cereal grains and different cultivars within each type of grain grown in semi-arid area using FTIR spectroscopy with uni- and multi-variate molecular spectral analyses2014194136144https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.05.007GriesserM.WeingartG.Schoedl-HummelK.NeumannN.BeckerM.VarmuzaK.LiebnerF.SchuhmacherR.ForneckA.Severe drought stress is affecting selected primary metabolites. polyphenols. and volatile metabolites in grapevine leaves (Vitis vinifera cv. Pinot noir)2015881726https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.01.004HayatQ.HayatS.IrfanM.AhmadA.Effect of exogenous salicylic acid under changing environment: A review2010681425https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.08.005HellalF. A.El-ShabrawiH. M.Abd El-HadyM.KhatabI. A.El-SayedS. A. A.AbdellyC.Influence of PEG induced drought stress on molecular and biochemical constituents and seedling growth of Egyptian barley cultivars201816203212https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2017.10.009HussainH. A.HussainS.KhaliqA.AshrafU.AnjumS. A.MenS.WangL.Chilling and drought stresses in crop plants: Implications, cross talk, and potential management opportunities20189393https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00393InuwaR. S.MuhammadY. Y.Drought affects protein and phenolic content in bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc.)201810345349https://doi.org/10.4314/bajopas.v10i1.69SJongdeeB.FukaiS.CooperM.PantuwanG.Screening for drought resistance in rainfed lowland rice1999646174https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00051-9JongdeeB.PantuwanG.FukaiS.FischerK.Improving drought tolerance in rainfed lowland rice: An example from Thailand200680225240https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.015KanawapeeN.SanitchonJ.LontomW.TheerakulpisutP.Evaluation of salt tolerance at the seedling stage in rice genotypes by growth performance, ion accumulation, proline and chlorophyll content20123581–2235249https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1179-6KhanF.UpretiP.SinghR.ShuklaP. K.ShirkeP. A.Physiological performance of two contrasting rice varieties under water stress20172318597https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-016-0399-2KumarJ. K.Devi PrasadA. G.Identification and comparison of biomolecules in medicinal plants of Tephrosia tinctoria and Atylosia albicans by using FTIR2011216371KumarS.DwivediS. K.SinghS. S.JhaS. K.LekshmyS.ElanchezhianR.SinghO. N.BhatiB. P.Identification of drought tolerant rice genotypes by analysing drought tolerance indices and morpho-physiological traits2014462217230KumarS.LahlaliR.LiuX.KarunakaranC.Infrared spectroscopy combined with imaging: A new developing analytical tool in health and plant science201651466483https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2016.1157808LanF.KongD.LiY.HuangR.Studies on the changes of protein secondary structure and carbohydrate contents in seedling-stage of Abrus cantoniensis Hance in drought stress based on FTIR and chemometrics20154713111316LarkunthodP.HounjiaN.SiangliwJ. L.ToojindaT.SanithonJ.JongdeeB.TheerakulpisutP.Physiological responses under drought stress of improved drought tolerant rice lines and their parents2018462679687https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha46211188LegnerN.MeinenC.RauberR.Root differentiation of agricultural plant cultivars and proveniences using FTIR spectroscopy20189748https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00748LenkaS. K.KatiyarA.ChinnusamyV.BansalK. C.Comparative analysis of drought-responsive transcriptome in Indica rice genotypes with contrasting drought tolerance20119315327https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00560.xLuZ.NeumannP. M.Water-stressed maize, barley, and rice seedlings show species diversity in mechanisms of leaf growth inhibition19984919451952https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/49.329.1945LuzR. B.Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy of plant leaves: A tool for ecological and botanical studies2006172305318https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01823.xMcCannM. C.ChenL.RobertsK.KemsleyE. K.SeneC.CarpitaN. C.StaceyN. J.WilsonR. H.Infrared microspectroscopy: Sampling heterogeneity in plant cell wall composition and architecture1997100729738https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb03080.xMcCannM. C.HammouriM.WilsonR.BeltonP.RobertsK.Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy is a new way to look at plant cell walls199210019401947https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.100.4.1940MonkhamT.JongdeeB.PantuwanG.MitchellJ. H.SanitchonJ.FukaiS.On-farm multi-location evaluation of occurrence of drought types and rice genotypes selected from controlled-water on-station experiments in northeast Thailand20182202736https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.05.004MonkhamT.JongdeeB.PantuwanG.SanitchonJ.MitchellJ. H.FukaiS.Genotypic variation in grain yield and flowering pattern in terminal and intermittent drought screening methods in rainfed lowland rice20151752636https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.02.003NikaljeG. C.KumarJ.NikamT. D.SuprasannaP.FT-IR profiling reveals differential response of roots and leaves to salt stress in a halophyte Sesuvium portulacastrum (L.)201923e00352https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2019.e00352PhansakP.SiriwongS.SangpueakR.KanawapeeN.ThumanuK.BuensanteaiN.Screening rice blast-resistant cultivars via synchrotron Fourier transform infrared (SR-FTIR) microspectroscopy2021339726741PrasadP. V. V.StaggenborgS. A.RisticZ.AhujaL. R.ReddyV. R.SaseendranS. A.YuQ.Impacts of drought and/or heat stress on physiological, developmental, growth, and yield processes of crop plants20081301355https://doi.org/10.2134/advagricsystmodel1.c11PremachandraG. S.SaneokaH.FujitaK.OgataS.Leaf water relations, osmotic adjustment, cell membrane stability, epicuticular wax load and growth as affected by increasing water deficits in sorghum19924315691576https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/43.12.1569QiuL.LiX. Y.LiuP.FanS. G.XieM. H.LiuR. M.WangJ.Analysis of leave FTIR of nine kinds of plants from Rosaceae with genetic relationship2014342344349RizhskyL.LiangH.ShumanJ.ShulaevV.DavletovaS.MittlerR.When defence pathways collide. The response of Arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress200413416831696https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.033431SahebiM.HanafiM. M.RafiiM. Y.MahmudT. M. M.AziziP.OsmanM.AbiriR.TaheriS.KalhoriN.ShabanimofradM.MiahG.AtabakiN.Improvement of drought tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.): Genetics, genomic tools, and the WRKY gene family201820183158474https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3158474SanchezP. M.PauliE. D.ScheelG. L.RakocevicM.BrunsR. E.ScarminioI. S.Irrigation and light access effects on Coffea arabica L. leaves by FTIR-chemometric analysis201829168176https://doi.org/10.21577/0103-5053.20170125SchonfeldM. A.JohnsonR. C.CarverB. F.MornhinwegD. W.Water relations in winter wheat as drought resistance indicators198828526531https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183X002800030021xSharmaP.JhaA. B.DubeyR. S.PessarakliM.Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage and antioxidative defence mechanism in plants under stressful conditions201226217037https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/217037ShereenA.KhanzadaM. A.BalochM. A. W.AsmaShiraziM. U.KhanM. A.ArifM.Effects of PEG induced water stress on growth and physiological responses of rice genotypes at seedling stage201951620132021https://doi.org/10.30848/PJB2019-6(13)SovannarunV.NualsriC.NakkanongK.DuangpanS.Morphological and physiological responses of local rice varieties to drought stress2019644754SultanM. S.Abdel-MoneamM. A.El-AbdA. B.El-NaemS. A.Inheritance of some root and grain quality traits in rice under water deficiency conditions20141338999https://doi.org/10.3923/ja.2014.89.99SurewiczW. K.MantschH. H.ChapmanD.Determination of protein secondary structure by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy: A critical assessment199332389394https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00053a001ThanhL. T.ThumanuK.WongkaewS.BoonkerdN.TeaumroongN.PhansakP.BuensanteaiN.Salicylic acid-induced accumulation of biochemical components associated with resistance against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in rice201712108120https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2017.1291859ThumanuK.SompongM.PhansakP.NontapotK.BuensanteaiN.Use of infrared microspectroscopy to determine leaf biochemical composition of cassava in response to Bacillus subtilis CaSUT007201510270279https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2015.1059957ThumanuK.WongchaleeD.SompongM.PhansakP.ThanhL. T.NamanusartW.VechklangK.KaewnumS.BuensanteaiN.Synchrotron-based FTIR microspectroscopy of chili resistance induced by bacillus subtilis strain d604 against anthracnose disease201712255263https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2017.1325523Türker-KayaS.HuckC. W.A review of mid-infrared and near-infrared imaging: Principles, concepts and applications in plant tissue analysis201722168https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22010168VaeziB.BaveiV.ShiranB.Screening of barley genotypes for drought tolerance by agro-physiological traits in field condition20105881892WangW.VinocurB.AltmanA.Plant responses to drought. salinity and extreme temperatures: Towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance2003218114https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-003-1105-5WestworthS.AshwathN.CozzolinoD.Application of FTIR-ATR spectroscopy to detect salinity response in beauty leaf tree (Calophyllum inophyllum L.)2019160761768https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.182YoshidaS.FornoD. A.CockJ. H.GomezK. A.International Rice Research Institute1976YuP.Synchrotron IR microspectroscopy for protein structure analysis: Potential and questions201220229251https://doi.org/10.1155/2006/263634XieE.LiY.TangD.LvY.ShenY.ChengZ.A strategy for generating rice apomixis by gene editing2019618911916https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12785ZareM.AziziM. H.BazrafshanF.Effect of drought stress on some agronomic traits in ten barley (Hordeum vulgare) cultivars201115762ZhaoX.YangX.ShiY.ChenG.LiX.Protein and lipid characterization of wheat roots plasma membrane damaged by Fe and H using ATR-FTIR method201342835https://doi.org/10.4236/jbpc.2013.41004ZhaoY.ZhaoJ.ZhaoC.ZhouH.LiY.ZhangJ.LiL.HuC.LiW.PengX.LuX.LinF.XuG.A metabolomics study delineating geographical location-associated primary metabolic changes in the leaves of growing tobacco plants by GC-MS and CE-MS2015516346https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16346
Authors’ Contributions. PP, SS, NK, KT, WG, and NB contributed to the research conception and design; PP, SS, and WG prepared the materials and collected and analyzed the data; SS and KT conducted a deep FTIR rice-drought screening and analyzed the data; PP, SS, and WG performed the statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript; PP, NB, and NK commented on and edited the previous versions of the manuscript