Comparative Floral Morphology and Anatomy of Gagea s. str. and Lloydia

Andriy Novikov

Abstract


Flowers of the five species from the four sections of the genus Gagea (that is, G. lutea, G. pusilla, G. reticulata, G. fragifera, and G. serotina (syn. Lloydia serotina) were investigated by light microscopy. All investigated species had similar flower organization, vertical zonality of the gynoecium, and floral vascularization. In all species, the flowers were trimerous, with the superior ovary and short complete or semicomplete syntepalous zone at the base. The presence of the syntepalous zone allows consideration of such flowers as an intermediate between hypogynous and perigynous.

All investigated species had nectaries at the base of the tepals. However, in Gagea s. str., they were represented by relatively small nectariferous areas of the tepals located at the beginning of the synascidiate zone of the gynoecium. In contrast, the nectaries in G. serotina were represented by elongated tepalar outgrowths located higher, at the level of the fertile symplicate zone of the gynoecium. Considering reports on the potential peltate origin of the nectaries in G. serotina, it is probably incorrect to interpret them as homologous to the nectaries in Gagea s. str.

The gynoecium in the studied species demonstrated identical vertical zonality with synascidiate, symplicate, and asymptomatic zones, and corresponded to type C of the syncarpous gynoecium. At the base of the ovary, three carpels were congenitally isolated (primary synascidiate zone); however, they were isolated only postgenitally (secondary synascidiate zone). This secondary synascidiate zone originated from a symplicate zone due to the fusion of the carpelar margins. Although it looks like a synascidiate zone, for correct interpretation of the gynoecium’s vertical structure, it should be considered symplicate.

The vascularization of the flower in all investigated species was similar, with the participation of lateral vascular bundles in the supply of placentas.


Keywords


Gagea; Lloydia; vascular anatomy; morphology; flower

Full Text:

PDF XML (JATS)

References


Bader, B. M. A., Ceter, T., & Bani, B. (2018). Investigation of the antimicrobial activity of Gagea dubia. Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series C Biology, 27(2), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1501/commuc_0000000218

Барыкина [Barykina], Р. П. [R. P.], Веселова [Veselova], Т. Д. [T. D.], Девятов [Devjatov], А. Г. [A. G.], Джалилова [Dzhalilova], Х. Х. [H. H.], Ильина [Il’ina], Г. М. [G. M.], & Чубатова [Chubatova], Н. В. [N. V.] (2004). Справочник по ботанической микротехнике. Основы и методы [Handbook of the botanical microtechniques. Principles and methods]. Издательство Московского университета [Moscow University Press].

Baum, H. (1949). Der einheitliche Bauplan der Angiospermengynözeen und die Homologie ihrer fertilen Abschnitte [The uniform construction plan of the angiosperms gynoecia and homology of their fertile parts]. Österreichische Botanische Zeitschrift, 96(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01252340

Baum, H. (1952). Über die “primitivste” Karpellform. Österreichische Botanische Zeitschrift, 99(5), 632–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01288913

Bożek, M. (2019). Nectar secretion and pollen production in Hyacinthus orientalis ‘Sky Jacket’ (Asparagaceae). Acta Agrobotanica, 72(4), Article 1796. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.1796

Buxbaum, F. (1937). Die Entwicklungslinien der Lilioideae. III. Die Lilioideae Engl. [The development lines of Lilioideae. III. Lilioideae Engl.]. Botanisches Archiv, 38, 305–398.

Daumann, E. (1970). Das Blütennektarium der Monocotyledonen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung seiner systematischen und phylogenetischen Bedeutung [The floral nectarium of the monocotyledons with special consideration of its systematic and phylogenetic importance]. Feddes Repertorium, 80(7–8), 463–590. https://doi.org/10.1002/fedr.19700800702

Dmitruk, M. (2019). Flowering, nectar secretion, and structure of the nectary in the flowers of Acer pseudoplatanus L. Acta Agrobotanica, 72(3), Article 1787. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.1787

Dyka, O. (2018). Flower morphology and vascular anatomy in some representatives of Urgineoideae (Hyacinthaceae). Thaiszia – Journal of Botany, 28(2), 125–143.

Hardy, C. R., & Stevenson, D. W. (2000). Development of the gametophytes, flower, and floral vasculature in Cochliostema odoratissimum (Commelinaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 134(1–2), 131–157. https://doi.org/d75t2j

Heigl, H. M., Kretschmann, J., Hilger, H. H., & Gottschling, M. (2020). Flower and fruit anatomy of Cordia nodosa Lam. and Varronia bonplandii Desv. (Cordiaceae, Boraginales) with phylogenetic implications. Organisms Diversity & Evolution, 20, 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-019-00420-4

Heywood, V. H. (1980). Lloydia Salisb. ex Rchb. In T. G. Tutin, V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, & S. M. Walters (Eds.), Flora Europaea. Vol. 5. Alismataceae to Orchidaceae (pp. 26–28). Cambridge University Press.

Jones, B., & Gliddon, C. (1999). Reproductive biology and genetic structure in Lloydia serotina. Plant Ecology, 141, 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009805401483

Joshi, A. (1940). The conservate character of the vascular system: Comparative anatomy of normal and pentaphyllous bicarpellary flowers of Gagea fascicularis. Annals of Botany, 4(3), 664–669. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/4.3.664

Leinfellner, W. (1950). Der Bauplan des synkarpen Gynözeums [The construction plan of the syncarpous gynoecia]. Österreichische Botanische Zeitschrift, 97(3–5), 403–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01763317

Leinfellner, W. (1963). Zur Kenntnis des Monokotyledonen-Perigons. VI. Ein Vergleich der Perigonblätter von Lloydia und Fritillaria mit den Nektarblättern von Ranunculus [To the knowledge of the monocotyledon perigons. VI. A comparison of the tepals of Lloydia and Fritillaria with the nectariferous tepals of Ranunculus]. Österreichische Botanische Zeitschrift, 110, 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01373676

Levichev, I. G. (1999). Phytogeographical analysis of the genus Gagea Salisb. (Liliaceae). Komarovia, 1, 47–59.

Левичев [Levichev], И. Г. [I. G.] (2006). Обзор видов рода Gagea (Liliaceae) во флоре Кавказа [A review of the Gagea (Liliaceae) species in the flora of Caucasus]. Ботанический Журнал [Botanicheskii Zhurnal], 91(6), 917–951.

Lovett-Doust, J., & Lovett-Doust, L. (1988). Plant reproductive ecology: Patterns and strategies. Oxford University Press.

Margelienė, J. (2009). The research on the use of wild ornamental plants and evaluation of morphological and bioecological peculiarities. In Proceedings of the 7th International Scientific and Practical Conference “Environment. Technology. Resources” (Vol. 2, pp. 17–24). Rēzeknes Augstskola. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2009vol2.1041

Nicolson, S. W., Nepi, M., & Pacini, E. (2007). Nectaries and nectar. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5937-7

Novikoff, A. V., & Jabbour, F. (2014). Floral anatomy of Delphinieae (Ranunculaceae): Comparing flower organization and vascular patterns. Modern Phytomorphology, 5, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.161001

Novikoff, A. V., & Kazemirska, M. A. (2012). Vascular anatomy and morphology of the flower in Fritillaria montana Hoppe (Liliaceae). Modern Phytomorphology, 1, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.162716

Novikoff, A. V., & Odintsova, A. (2008). Some aspects of gynoecium morphology in three bromeliad species. Wulfenia, 15, 13–24.

Новіков [Novikov], A. B. [A. V.] (2008). Морфологія та васкулярна анатомія квітки Ornithogalum caudatum Ait. (Hyacinthaceae) [Floral morphology and vascular anatomy of Ornithogalum caudatum Ait. (Hyacinthaceae)]. Біологічні Студії [Studia Biologica], 2(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.30970/sbi.0201.011

Nuraliev, M. S., Yudina, S. V., Shepeleva, E. A., Truong, B. V., Do, T. X., Beer, A. S., & Remizowa, M. V. (2021). Floral structure in Thismia (Thismiaceae: Dioscoreales): New insights from anatomy, vasculature and development. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 195, 501–531. https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boaa066

Odintsova, A., Fishchuk, O., & Sulborska, A. (2013). The gynoecium structure in Dracaena fragrans (L.) Ker Gawl., Sansevieria parva N. E. Brown and Sansevieria trifasciata Prain (Asparagaceae s. l.) with special emphasis on the structure of the septal nectary. Acta Agrobotanica, 66(4), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2013.051

Oliveira, F. M., Oliveira, F. C., Rodrigues, A. C., Lusa, M. G., & Melo-de-Pinna, G. F. (2020). Androecium and gynoecium anatomy of Bromeliaceae species. Flora, 263, Article 151538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2020.151538

Peruzzi, L., Tison, J.-M., Peterson, A., & Peterson, J. (2008). On the phylogenetic position and taxonomic value of Gagea trinervia (Viv.) Greuter and the whole Gagea sect. Anthericoides A. Terracc. (Liliaceae). Taxon, 57, 1201–1214. https://doi.org/10.1002/TAX.574013

Peterson, A., Levichev, I. G., & Peterson, J. (2008). Systematics of Gagea and Lloydia (Liliaceae) and infrageneric classification of Gagea based on molecular and morphological data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 46(2), 446–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.11.016

Porsch, O. (1913). Die Abstammung der Monokotylen und die Blütennektarien [The origin of the monocots and the floral nectaries]. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft, 31, 580–590.

Remizowa, M. V., Sokoloff, D. D., Timonin, A. C., & Rudall, P. J. (2010). Floral vasculature in Tofieldia (Tofieldiaceae) is correlated with floral morphology and development. In O. Seberg, G. Petersen, A. Barfod, & J. I. Davis (Eds.), Diversity, phylogeny, and evolution in the monocotyledons (pp. 81–99). Aarhus University Press.

Шамров [Shamrov], И. И. [I. I.] (2010). Особенности формирования синкарпного гинецея у некоторых однодольных растений [The peculiarities of syncarpous gynoecium formation in some monocotyledonous plants]. Ботанический Журнал [Botanicheskii Zhurnal], 95(8), 1041–1070.

Шамров [Shamrov], И. И. [I. I.] (2012). Типы гинецея покрытосеменных растений: терминология и проблемы интерпретации [Types of gynoecium in angiosperm plants: Terminology and problems of interpretation]. Ботанический Журнал [Botanicheskii Zhurnal], 97(4), 417–451. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1234567812040015

Silva, A. L., Alves, M. V. S., & Coan, A. I. (2020). Comparative floral morphology and anatomy of Thurniaceae, an early-diverging family in the cyperids (Poales, Monocotyledons). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 306, Article 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-020-01681-9

Silva, A. L., Trovó, M., & Coan, A. I. (2016). Floral development and vascularization help to explain merism evolution in Paepalanthus (Eriocaulaceae, Poales). PeerJ, 4, Article e2811. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2811

Singh, B., Sultan, P., Hassan, Q. P., Gairola, S., & Bedi, Y. S. (2016). Ethnobotany traditional knowledge, and diversity of wild edible plants and fungi: A case study in the Bandipora District of Kashmir Himalaya, India. Journal of Herbs, Spices & Medicinal Plants, 22(3), 247–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496475.2016.1193833

Sokoloff, D. D., Remizowa, M. V., Timonin, A. C., Oskolski, A. A., & Nuraliev, M. S. (2018). Types of organ fusion in angiosperm flowers (with examples from Chloranthaceae, Araliaceae and monocots). Biologia Serbica, 40, 16–46. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1406316

Sterling, C. (1974). Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Liliaceae: Baeometra, Burchardia and Walleria. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 68(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1974.tb01752.x

Sterling, C. (1977). Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Liliaceae: Uvularieae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 74(4), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1977.tb01186.x

Sterling, C. (1982). Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Liliaceae: Veratreae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 84(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1982.tb00360.x

Тахтаджян [Tahtadzhjan], А. Л. [A. L.] (1980). Плодолистики [Carpels]. In А. Л. [A. L.] Тахтаджян [Tahtadzhjan] (Ed.), Жизнь растений. Т. 5, Ч. 1 [Plants’ life, Vol. 5, Part 1] (pp. 31–33). Просвещение [Prosveshhenie].

Tamura, M. N. (1998). Liliaceae. In K. Kubitzki (Ed.), The families and genera of vascular plants (Vol. 3, pp. 343–353). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03533-7_41

Tilton, V. R., & Horner, H. T. (1983). Carpel development, anatomy, and function in the reproductive process in Ornithogalum caudatum (Liliaceae). Flora, 173(1–2), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0367-2530(17)31986-2

Vaikos, N. P., & Pai, R. M. (1982). The floral anatomy of Kniphofia uvaria Hook. (Liliaceae: Kniphofieae). Proceedings of Indian Academy of Sciences: Plant Sciences, 91(4), 351–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03053360

van Tieghem, P. (1871). Recherches sur la structure du pistil et sur l’anatomie comparée de la fleur [Research on the structure of the pistil and the comparative anatomy of the flower]. Imprimerie nationale.

Vazquez-Cooz, I., & Meyer, R. W. (2002). A differential staining method to identify lignified and unlignified tissues. Biotechnic & Histochemistry, 77, 277–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/bih.77.5-6.277.282

Weberling, F. (1992). Morphology of flowers and inflorescences. Cambridge University Press.

Xinqi, C., & Turland, N. (2000a). Gagea. In Z. Wu, & P. Raven (Eds.), Flora of China (Vol. 24, pp. 117–121). Science Press; Missouri Botanical Garden Press.

Xinqi, C., & Turland, N. (2000b). Lloydia. In Z. Wu, & P. Raven (Eds.), Flora of China (Vol. 24, pp. 121–123). Science Press; Missouri Botanical Garden Press.

Yeşil, Y., Çelik, M., & Yılmaz, B. (2019). Wild edible plants in Yeşilli (Mardin-Turkey), a multicultural area. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 15, Article 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-019-0327-y

Zalko, J., & Deroin, T. (2018). Floral anatomy and micromorphology of Hyacinthoides italica (L.) Rothm. A case of complete stachyospory in Asparagaceae. Modern Phytomorphology, 12, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1313005

Zarrei, M., Wilkin, P., Fay, M. F., Ingrouille, M. J., Zarre, S., & Chase, M. W. (2009). Molecular systematics of Gagea and Lloydia (Liliaceae; Liliales): Implications of analyses of nuclear ribosomal and plastid sequences for infrageneric classification. Annals of Botany, 104, 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp103

Zarrei, M., Wilkin, P., Ingrouille, M., & Chase, M. (2011). A revised infrageneric classification for Gagea Salisb (Tulipeae; Liliaceae): Insights from DNA sequence and morphological data. Phytotaxa, 15, 44–56.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.7412

Journal ISSN:
  • 2300-357X (online)
  • 0065-0951 (print; ceased since 2016)
This is an Open Access journal, which distributes its content under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, provided that the content is properly cited.
The journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and aims to follow the COPE’s principles.
The journal publisher is a member of the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association.
The journal content is indexed in Similarity Check, the Crossref initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism.
Publisher
Polish Botanical Society