Nectar defense and hydrogen peroxide in floral nectar of Cucurbita pepo

Daniele Nocentini, Massimo Guarnieri, Chiara Soligo

Abstract


This study was carried out to investigate some similarities between the nectaries of Nicotiana sp. and Cucurbita pepo, such as starch accumulation in the nectary parenchyma, changes in nectary color during maturation, and the production of a large quantity of sucrose-dominant nectar. The concentration of hydrogen peroxide in C. pepo floral nectar was determined in order to verify the presence of a defense mechanism similar to that found in Nicotiana sp. which protects nectar from yeast and bacteria proliferation. We also tested the eventual accumulation of antioxidants in the nectary of C. pepo as a protection against oxidative stress caused by hydrogen peroxide. The level of hydrogen peroxide found in the floral nectar of C. pepo was much lower than that found in Nicotiana sp. and the male flowers of Cucurbita had a higher concentration than the female flowers. The low oxidative stress induced by this level of hydrogen peroxide caused the accumulation of a low amount of lutein inside the plastoglobules which were contained in amyloplasts. Plastids of the C. pepo nectary are specialized in the accumulation of starch rather than antioxidants.

Keywords


nectar; nectary; plastids; hydrogen peroxide; lutein; antioxidants; nectar defense

Full Text:

PDF

References


Pacini E, Viegi L, Franchi GG. Types, evolution and significance of plant-animal interactions. Rendiconti Lincei. 2008;19:75–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12210-008-0005-9

Faegri K, van der Pjil L. The principles of pollination ecology. 3rd ed. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1979.

Heil M, 2008. Indirect defense-via tritrophic interactions. New Phytol. 2008;78:41–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02330.x

Herrera CM, de Vega C, Canto A, Pozo MI. Yeasts in floral nectar: a quantitative survey. Ann Bot. 2009;103:1415–1423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp026

Canto A, Herrera CM, García IM, Pérez R, Vaz M. Intraplant variation in nectar traits in Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae) as related to floral phase, environmental conditions and pollinator exposure. Flora. 2011;206:668–675. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2011.02.003

Baker HG, Baker I. Chemical constituents of nectar in relation to pollination mechanism and phylogeny. In: Nitecki MH, editor. Biochemical aspects of evolutionary biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1982. p. 131–171.

Raguso RA. Why are some floral nectar scented? Ecology. 2004;85:1486–1494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/03-0410

Nepi M, Bini L, Puglia M, Cai G. Xylan degrading enzymes in male and female flower nectar of Cucurbita pepo. Ann Bot. 2011;108:521–527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr165

Carter C, Graham R, Thornburg RW. Nectarin I is a novel, soluble germin-like protein expressed in the nectar of Nicotiana sp. Plant Mol Biol. 1999;41:201–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006363508648

Carter C, Healy R, O’Tool NM, Naqvi SM, Ren G, Park S, et al. Tobacco nectaries express a novel NADPH oxidase implicated in the defense of floral reproductive tissues against microorganism. Plant Physiol. 2007;143:389–399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.089326

Carter C, Thornburg RW. Tobacco Nectarin I: purification and characterization as a germin-like, manganese superoxide dismutase implicated in the defense of floral reproductive tissues. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:36726–36733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M006461200

Carter C, Thornburg RW. Is the nectar redox cycle a floral defense against microbial attack? Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9:320–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2004.05.008

Horner HT, Healy RA, Ren G, Klyne A, Seames C, Thornburg RW. Amyloplast to chromoplast conversion in developing ornamental tobacco floral nectaries provides sugar for nectar and antioxidants for protection. Am J Bot. 2007;94:12–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.1.12

Nepi M, Ciampolini F, Pacini E. Development of Cucurbita pepo nectaries of male flowers. Ann Bot. 1996;78:95–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0100

Nepi M, Guarnieri M, Pacini E. Nectar secretion, reabsorption, and sugar composition in male and female flowers of Cucurbita pepo. Int J Plant Sci. 2001;162:353–358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/319581

Dmitruk M. Flowering biology, nectar production and insect visits in Cucurbita pepo L. flowers. Acta Agrobot. 2006;59:183–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/aa.2006.019

Nepi M, Pacini E. Pollination, pollen viability and pistil receptivity in Cucurbita pepo. Ann Bot. 1993;72:527–536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1993.1141

Dmitruk M, Weryszko-Chmielewska E. The morphology and ultrastructure of the nectaries of marrow (Cucurbita pepo L. convar. giromontiina). Acta Agrobot. 2013;66:11–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/aa.2013.033

Whitacker TW, Bemis WP. Cucurbits: Cucumis, Citrullus, Cucurbita, Lagenaria (Cucurbitaceae). In: Simmonds NW, editor. Evolution of crop plants. London: Longman; 1976. p. 243–257.

Bleau G, Gaisson C, Brunette I. Measurement of hydrogen peroxide in biological samples containing high levels of ascorbic acid. Anal Biochem. 1998;263:13–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/abio.1998.2801

Gay CA, Gebicki J, 2002. Perchloric acid enhances sensitivity and reproducibility of the ferric-xylenol orange peroxide assays. Anal Biochem. 2002;304:42–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/abio.2001.5566

Suzuki R, Takahashi M, Furuya K, Ishimaru T. Simplified technique for the rapid determination of Phytoplankton pigments by reverse-phase High-Performance-Chromatography. J Oceanogr. 1993;49:571–580. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02237463

Herrera CM, Garcìa IM, Pérez R. Invisible floral larcenies: microbial communities degrade floral nectar of bumble bee-pollinated plants. Ecology. 2008;89:2369–2376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/08-0241.1

Sasu MA, Seidl-Adams I, Wall K, Winsor JA, Stephenson AG. Floral transmission of Erwinia tracheiphila by cucumber beetles in a wild Cucurbita pepo. Environ Entomol. 2010;39:140–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/EN09190

Nepi M. Nectar: plant interface for complex interaction with biotic environment. In: Ramawat KG, Mérillon JM, Shivanna KR, editors. Reproductive biology of plants. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2014. p. 268–283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b16535-13

Nicolson SW, Thornburg RW. Nectar chemistry. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, editors. Nectaries and nectar. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007. p. 215–264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5937-7

Prince RC, Gunson DE. Superoxide production in neutrophils. Trends Biochem Sci. 1987;12:86–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0968-0004(87)90041-7

Vannette RL, Gauthier MPL, Fukami T. Nectar bacteria, but not yeast, weaken a plant – pollinator mutualism. Proc R Soc B. 2013;280:20122601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2601

Pozo MI, Lachance MA, Herrera CM. Nectar yeasts of two southern Spanish plants: the roles of immigration and physiological traits in community assembly. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012;80:281–293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01286.x




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2015.009

Journal ISSN:
  • 2300-357X (online)
  • 0065-0951 (print; ceased since 2016)
This is an Open Access journal, which distributes its content under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, provided that the content is properly cited.
The journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and aims to follow the COPE’s principles.
The journal publisher is a member of the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association.
The journal content is indexed in Similarity Check, the Crossref initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism.
Publisher
Polish Botanical Society