Estimation of the antifungal activity of some preparations against Diaporthe eres under in vitro conditions
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Uecker FA. A world list of Phomopsis names with notes on nomenclature, morphology and biology. Berlin: J. Cramer; 1988. (Mycologia Memoir; vol 13).
Mostert L, Crous PW, Kang CJ, Phillips AJL. Species of Phomopsis and a Libertella sp. occurring on grapevines with specific reference to South Africa: morphological, cultural, molecular and pathological characterization. Mycologia. 2001;93:145–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2001.12061286
Udayanga D, Liu XX, McKenzie EHC, Chukeatirote E, Bahkali AH, Hyde KD. The genus Phomopsis: biology, applications, species concepts and names of common phytopathogens. Fungal Divers. 2011;50:189–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-011-0126-9
Król ED, Abramczyk BA, Zalewska ED, Zimowska B. Fungi inhabiting fruit tree shoots with special reference to the Diaporthe (Phomopsis) genus. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Hortorum Cultus. 2017;16(4):113–126. https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2017.4.12
Guarnaccia V, Groenwald JZ, Woodhall J, Armengol J, Cinelli T, Eichmeier A, et al. Diaporthe diversity and pathogenicity revealed from a broad survey of grapevine diseases in Europe. Persoonia. 2018;40:135–153. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2018.40.06
Rossman AY, Udayanga D, Castlebury LA, Hyde KD. Proposal to conserve the name Diaporthe eres, with a conserved type, against all other competing names (Ascomycota, Diaporthales, Diaporthaceae). Taxon. 2014;63:934–935. https://doi.org/10.12705/634.23
Farr DF, Castlebury LA, Pardo-Schultheiss RA. Phomopsis amygdali causes peach shoot blight of cultivated peach trees in the southeastern United States. Mycologia. 1999;91:1008–1015. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1999.12061111
Farr DF, Castlebury LA, Rossman AY. Morphological and molecular characterization of Phomopsis vaccinii and additional isolates of Phomopsis from blueberry and cranberry in the Eastern United States. Mycologia. 2000;94:494–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2003.11833214
Kanematsu S, Minaka N, Kobayashi T, Kudo A, Ohtsu Y. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer regions and comparison of fertility in Phomopsis isolates from fruit trees. Journal of General Plant Pathology. 2000;66:191–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012944
Król E, Kowalik B. Grzyby z rodzaju Phomopsis występujące na pędach roślin sadowniczych. Postępy Nauk Rolniczych. 2011;2:31–42.
Karaoglanidis GS, Bardas G. First report of Phomopsis fruit decay on apple caused by Phomopsis mali in Greece. Plant Dis. 2006;90(3):375. https://doi.org/10.1094/pd-90-0375c
Živković ST, Stojanović SD, Balaź J, Gavrilović VP. Characteristics of Phomopsis sp. isolates of plum trees origin. Zbornik Matice Srpske za Prirodne Nauke. 2007;113:83–91. https://doi.org/10.2298/ZMSPN0713083Z
Thomidis T, Michailides TJ. Studies on Diaporthe eres as a new pathogen of peach trees in Greece. Plant Dis. 2009;93(12):1293–1279. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-93-12-1293
Gomes RR, Glienke C, Videira SIR, Lombard L, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW. Diaporthe: a genus of endophitic, saprobic and plant pathogenic fungi. Persoonia. 2013;31:1–41. https://doi.org/10.3767/003158513X666844
Udayanga D, Castlebury LA, Rossman AY, Chukeatirote E, Hyde KD. Insights into the genus Diaporthe: phylogenetic species delimitation in the D. eres species complex. Fungal Divers. 2014;67:203–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-014-0297-2
Sessa L, Abreo E, Bettucci L, Lupo S. Diversity and virulence of Diaporthe species associated with wood disease symptoms in deciduous fruit trees in Uruguay. Phytopathol Mediterr. 2017;56:431–444.
Mostert L, Denman S, Crous PW. In vitro screening of fungicides against Phomopsis viticola and Diaporthe perjuncta. Enology and Viticulture. 2000;21:62–65. https://doi.org/10.21548/21-2-2210
Król E. Influence of some chemicals on the viability of Phomopsis viticola Sacc. spores. J Plant Prot Res. 2005;45(3):195–204.
Rhouma A, Triki MA, Ouerteni K, Mezghanni M. Chemical and biological control of Phomopsis amygdale the causal agent of construction cancer of almond in Tunisia. Tunis J Plant Prot. 2008;3:69–77.
Rohini A, Gowtham HG, Niranjana SR. Evaluation of efficacy of fungicides against Phomopsis leaf blight of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.). International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research. 2015;5:45–50.
Heneberg P, Svoboda J, Pech P. Benzimidazole fungicides are detrimental to common farmland ants. Biol Conserv. 2018;221:114–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.004
Scheper RWA, Scott ES, Whisson DL. Phomopsis cane and leaf spot, discovery of the sexual stage of P. viticola type 1. Australian and New Zealand Wine Industry Journal. 1997;12(3):264–265.
Schilder AMC, Gillett JM, Sysak RW, Wise J. Evaluation of environmentally friendly products for control of fungal diseases of grapes. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Cultivation Technique and Phytopathological Problems in Organic Fruit-Growing and Viticulture; 2002 Feb 4–7; Weinsberg, Germany. Weinsberg: Foerdergemeinschaft Oekologischer Obstbau e.V.; 2002. p. 163–167.
Baroffio CA, Siegfried W, Hiber UW. Longterm monitoring for resistance of Botryotinia fuckeliana to anilinopyrimidine, phenylpyrrole, and hydroxyanilide fungicides in Switzerland. Plant Dis. 2003;87:662–666. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.6.662
Mi Y, Tan W, Hang J, Wei L, Chen Y, Li Q, et al. Synthesis, characterization, and antifungal property of hydroxypropyltrimethyl ammonium chitosan halogenated acetates. Mar Drugs. 2018;16:315; https://doi.org/10.3390/md16090315
Oliva A, Meepagala KM, Wedge DE, Harries D, Hale AL, Aliotta G, et al. Natural fungicides from Ruta graveolens L. leaves, including a new quinolone alkaloid. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51(4):890–896. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0259361
Sesan T.E, Iacomi B.M, Oprea M, Oancea F, Iacomi C. Antifungal activity of some plant extracts against Botrytis cinerea Pers. in the blaccurrant crop (Ribes nigrum L.). Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Hortorum Cultus. 2015;14(1):29–43.
Piekutowska M. Potential of natural plant extracts for health and vigour improvement of seed material of agricultural crops. Problems of Small Agricultural Holdings. 2017;3:43–59. https://doi.org/10.15576/pdgr/2017.3.43
Fan Z, Qin Y, Liu S, Xing R, Yu H, Chen X, et al. Synthesis, characterization, and antifungal evaluation of diethoxyphosphoryl polyaminoethyl chitosan derivatives. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;190:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.02.056
Orlikowski LB, Skrzypczak C, Harnaj I. Biological activity of grapefruit extract in the control of forme speciales of Fusarium oxysporum. J Plant Prot Res. 2001;41(4):104–111.
Orlikowski LB, Skrzypczak C, Jaworska-Marosz A. Influence of grapefruit extract on the growth and development of Botrytis spp. and grey mold development on lily and peony. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Biological Sciences. 2001;49(4):373–378.
Pięta D, Patkowska E, Pastucha A. Influence of biopreparations on growing and development of some pathogenic fungi. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Hortorum Cultus. 2004;3(2):171–177.
Król E. Chitosan activity in an inhibition of in vitro growth of Phomopsis viticola and protection of grapevine canes against the pathogen. Phytopathol Pol. 2006;39:155–162.
Zalewska ED, Machowicz-Stefaniak Z, Król E. Harmfulness of Phomopsis diachenii Sacc. to herbs from Apiaceae family and preparations limiting the growth of this fungus. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Hortorum Cultus. 2013;12(5):69–83.
Zimowska B, Król E. Effect of selected preparations on growth and development Boeremia strasseri, the causal agent of black stem and rhizomes rot of peppermint (Mentha piperita). Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Hortorum Cultus. 2018;17(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2018.1.1
Yang G, Jin Q, Xu C, Fan S, Wang C, Xie P. Synthesis, characterization and antifungal activity of coumarin-functionalized chitosan derivatives. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;106:179–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.08.009
Nascimento T, Rego C, Oliveira H. Potential use of chitosan in the control of grapevine trunk diseases. Phytopathol Mediterr. 2007;46:218–224.
Pastucha A. Chitosan as a compound inhabiting the occurrence of soybean diseases. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Hortorum Cultus. 2008;7(3):41–55.
Jannat R, Shaha M, Rubayet MT, Sultana S. Role of chitosan in induction of defense response against Phomopsis vexans and augmentation of growth and yield of eggplant. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: C Biological Science. 2018;18:6–13.
Abramczyk BA, Król ED, Zalewska ED, Zimowska B. Morphological characteristics and pathogenicity of Diaporthe eres isolates to the fruit tree shoots. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Hortorum Cultus. 2018;17(6):125–133. https://doi.org/10.24326/asphc.2018.6
Abramczyk BA, Król ED, Zalewska ED, Zimowska B. Influence of selected factors on growth and sporulation of Diaporthe isolates from fruit plants. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Hortorum Cultus. Forthcoming 2020.
Abramczyk BA, Król ED. Use of RAPD-PCR and ITS markers for identification of Diaporthe/Phomopsis from fruit trees in south-eastern Poland. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Hortorum Cultus. 2016;15(6):161–175.
Kowalik R, Krechniak R. Szczegółowa metodyka biologicznych i laboratoryjnych badań środków chemicznych. Poznań: IOR; 1961.
Borecki Z. Fungicydy stosowane w ochronie roślin. Warszawa: PWN; 1984.
Lalancette N, Robinson DM. Effect of fungicides, application timing and cancer removal on incidence and severity of constriction cancer of peach. Plant Dis. 2002; 86: 721–728. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.7.721
Burges N, Taylor A, Kumar S. Phomopsis cane and leaf spot. Phomopsis viticola (synonym: P. viticola Taxon 2) an exotic threat to Western Australia. Factsheet. 2005;9:9–10.
Machowicz-Stefaniak Z, Kuropatwa E. Badanie efektywności fungicydów w ochronie winorośli uprawianej pod folią przed nekrozą korową (Phomopsis viticola Sacc.). Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio EEE: Horticultura. 1994;2:103–108.
Kuropatwa E. Badanie efektywnooeci grzybobójczej fungicydów dla Phomopsis viticola SACC. powodującego nekrozę korową winoroośli. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio EEE: Horticultura. 1994;2:109–115.
Król E. Phomopsis viticola Sacc. jako patogen winorośli na świecie i w Polsce. Postępy Nauk Rolniczych. 2004;4:85–96.
Król E. Trichoderma spp. and other microorganisms in the control of Phomopsis viticola on grapevine canes. Phytopathol Pol. 2004;31:25–31.
Ye Y, Pu B. Experiment of testing the capability of Tianranzhibao agent to control peach fruit rot disease. South China Fruits. 2004;33:66.
Maxim A, Zagrai I, Zagrai L, Fitiu A, Sandor M. Sequences in biological pest control of phytopathogenic agents for apple trees. Contributii Botanice. 2005;15:281–284.
Chen XJ, Ye ZY. Preliminary study on resistance of Phomopsis asparagi Sacc. to tiophanate-methyl. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University. 1999;22:29–32.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.1789
|
|
|