Flowering, nectar secretion, and structure of the nectary in the flowers of Acer pseudoplatanus L.

Marta Dmitruk


Flowering and nectar release in Acer pseudoplatanus were investigated between 2011 and 2013. The micromorphology of the floral and nectary elements was observed using a scanning electron microscope and the anatomy of nectaries was examined by light microscopy. The inflorescence of the sycamore was found to contain flowers, which were functionally male or functionally female. The life-span of the former was on average 5 days, whereas the latter lived on average 4 days. Both types of A. pseudoplatanus flowers had yellow-green nectaries with a similar structure. The nectary tissue formed an elliptical or circular layer located on the receptacle surface between the petals and the pistil. The filament bases were located within the nectary recesses but were not fused with this organ. The nectary margins were slightly undulated. The outer diameter of the nectary was in 3.0–3.25 mm and the thickness of the nectary tissue was in the range of 532–1,023 μm. The nectary of the sycamore flower comprised a single layer of epidermal cells and several layers of secretory parenchyma cells. The average depth of epidermal cells was 16.8 μm. The stomata, which were involved in the secretion process, were arranged unevenly on the nectary surface and were surrounded by six–eight epidermal cells. Visible droplets of nectar accumulated on the nectary surface and thus they were easily accessible to insects. The average weight of nectar from 10 flowers was 16.54 mg (range: 11.0–23.75 mg) and the content of sugars in the nectar was found to be in the range of 23.5–50%, with an average of 37.3%. The calculated weight of sugars in the nectar from 10 flowers was on average 6.11 mg and so the average sugar yield from one sycamore tree was estimated to be 0.65 kg.


sycamore; flower micromorphology; nectar production; micromorphology and anatomy of nectary

Full Text:



Aas G, Riedmiller A. Drzewa. Encyclopedia kieszonkowa. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Muza; 1994.

Szweykowska A, Szweykowski J, editors. Słownik botaniczny. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Wiedza Powszechna; 2003.

Seneta W, Dolatowski J. Dendrologia. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe; 2007.

Streiling S, Matzarakis A. Influence of single and small clusters of trees on the bioclimate of a city: a case study. Journal of Arboriculture. 2003;29(6):309–316.

Chang CR, Li MH. Effects of urban parks on the local urban thermal environment. Urban For Urban Green. 2014;13:672–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.08.001

Kuchcik M, Dudek W, Błażejczyk K, Milewski P, Błażejczyk A. Two faces to the greenery on housing estates – mitigating climate but aggravating allergy. A Warsaw case study. Urban For Urban Green. 2016;16:170–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.02.012

Heisler GM. Effects of individual trees on the solar radiation climate of small buildings. Urban Ecology. 1986;9:337–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4009(86)90008-2

Pritsch G. Bienenweide: 200 Trachtpflanzen erkennen und bewerten. Stuttgart: Kosmos; 2007.

Lipiński M. Pożytki pszczele. Zapylanie i miododajność roślin. Warszawa: Powszechne Wydawnictwo Rolnicze i Leśne; 2010.

Somme L, Moquet L, Quinet M, Vanderplanck M, Michez D, Lognay G. et al. Food in a row: urban trees offer valuable floral resources to pollinating insects. Urban Ecosyst. 2016;19(3):1149–1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0555-z

Williams IH, Carreck N, Little DJ. Nectar sources for honey bees and the movement of honey bee colonies for crop pollination and honey production in England. Bee World. 1993;74:160–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.1993.11099182

Proctor M, Yeo P, Lack A. The natural history of pollination. Hampshire: The Bath Press; 1996.

Nekovář J, Dalezios N, Koch E, Kubin E, Nejedlik P, Niedzwiedz T, et al. The history and current status of plant phenology in Europe. COST action 725. Brussels: Cost Office; 2008.

Maurizio A, Grafl I. Das Trachtpflanzenbuch. München: Ehrenwirth Verlag; 1969.

Hesse M. Ultrastruktur und Verteilung des Pollenkitts in der insekten- und windblutigen Gattung Acer (Aceraceae). Plant Syst Evol. 1979;131:277–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984259

Weryszko-Chmielewska E, Piotrowska-Weryszko K, Haratym W, Dmitruk M, Sulborska A, Vorobets N. Changes in the pollen seasons of Acer spp. in Lublin, central-eastern Poland, in 2001–2015. Acta Agrobot. 2016;69(2):1670. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.1670

Bernardello G. A systematic survey of floral nectaries. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, editors. Nectaries and nectar. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007. p. 19–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5937-7_2

Jabłoński B. Metodyka badań obfitości nektarowania kwiatów i oceny miododajności roślin. Puławy: Oddział Pszczelnictwa Instytutu Sadownictwa i Kwiaciarstwa; 2003.

Hall BA. The floral anatomy of the genus Acer. Am J Bot. 1951;38(10):793–799. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1951.tb14895.x

Tal O. Acer pseudoplatanus (Sapindaceae): heterodichogamy and thrips pollination. Plant Syst Evol. 2009;278:211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-008-0141-9

Tripić R. Contribution to the knowledge of flowering phenology and sex expression in Acer platanoides L. from Montenegro. Natura Montenegrina, Podgorica. 2008;8(1):11–22.

Weryszko-Chmielewska E, Sulborska A. Morphological characters of the flowers and the structure of the nectaries of Acer platanoides L. Acta Agrobot. 2011;64(3):19–28. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2011.026

Yadav N, Pandey AK, Bhatnagar AK. Comparative anther and pistil anatomy of three flowering morphs of andromonoecious Acer oblongum (Sapindaceae s. l.) and its adaptive significance. Nord J Bot. 2017;36(1):e01572. https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.01572

Rosado A, Vera-Vélez R, Cota-Sánchez JH. Floral morphology and reproductive biology in selected maple (Acer L.) species (Sapindaceae). Brazilian Journal of Botany. 2018;41(2):361–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40415-018-0452-1

Renner SS, Beenken L, Grimm GW, Kocyan A, Ricklefs RE. The evolution of dioecy, heterodichogamy, and labile sex expression in Acer. Evolution. 2007;61:2701–2719. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00221.x

Matthews ML, Endress PK. Comparative floral structure and systematics in Celastrales (Celastraceae, Parnassiaceae, Lepidobotryaceae). Bot J Linn Soc. 2005;149:129–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2005.00445.x

Haragsim O. The nectar secretion of maple (Acer platanoides L.) and sycamore (A. pseudoplatanus L.). Apidologie. 1977;8(4):363–368. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:19770407

Gaffal KP, Heimler W, El-Gammal S. The floral nectary of Digitalis purpurea L., structure and nectar secretion. Ann Bot. 1998;81:251–262. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1997.0546

Nepi M, Ciampolini F, Pacini E. Development and ultrastructure of Cucurbita pepo nectaries of male flowers. Ann Bot. 1996;81:251–262.

Weryszko-Chmielewska E, Chwil M. Micromorphology of the epidermis of the floral nectary of Rhododendron japonicum (A. Gray) J. V. Suringar ex E. H. Wilson. Acta Agrobot. 2007;60(1):45–53. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2007.005

Fitter AH, Fitter RS. Rapid changes in flowering time in British plants. Science. 2002;296:1689–1691. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1071617

Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Koch E, Aasa A, Ahas R, et al. European phonological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob Chang Biol. 2006;12:1969–1976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01193.x

Jachuła J, Konarska A, Denisow B. Micromorphological and histochemical attributes of flowers and floral reward in Linaria vulgaris (Plantaginaceae). Protoplasma. 2018;255:1763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-018-1269-2

Denisow B, Strzałkowska-Abramek M, Wrzesień M. Nectar secretion and pollen production in protandrous flowers of Campanula patula L. (Campanulaceae). Acta Agrobot. 2018;71(1):1734. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.1734

Antoń S, Denisow B. Floral phenology and pollen production in the five nocturnal Oenothera species (Onagraceae). Acta Agrobot. 2018;71(2):1738. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.1738

Jachuła J, Denisow B, Strzałkowska-Abramek M. Floral reward and insect visitors in six ornamental Lonicera species – plants suitable for urban bee-friendly gardens. Urban For Urban Green. 2019;44:126390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126390

Denisow B, Tymoszuk K, Dmitruk M. Nectar and pollen production of Helianthus tuberosus L. – an exotic plant with invasiveness potential. Acta Bot Croat. Forthcoming 2019. https://doi.org/10.2478/botcro-2019-0019

Juknys R, Žeimavičius K, Sujetovienė G, Gustainytė J. Response of tree seasonal development to climate warming. Pol J Environ Stud. 2012;21(1):107–113.

Kolářová E, Nekovář J, Adamík P. Long-term temporal changes in Central European tree phenology (1946–2010) confirm the recent extension of growing season. Int J Biometeorol. 2014;58:1739–1748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-013-0779-z