Changes accompanying proliferative capacity and morphology of Nicotiana tabacum L. callus in response to 2,4-D

Andrzej Gatz, Magdalena Tomaszewska-Sowa, Anna Figas

Abstract


The common trait of all auxins is a stimulation of cell elongation and also cell division in the presence of cytokinin; both are essential for callus induction and its multiplication. The response of plant tissues to various compounds with auxin activity may be quite different. In this study, the effectiveness of a synthetic auxin, 2,4-dichlorofenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), instead of the generally applied natural auxin, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), was tested for the proliferation of Nicotiana tabacum callus. The following concentrations of 2,4-D were tested: 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mg dm−3. Callus was derived from stem pith and its proliferation allowed on MS medium through five subcultures at 25°C and in darkness. After each passage, the fresh weight and morphological features of the callus were determined. The 0.5 mg dm−3 2,4-D treatment was the most favorable for producing the greatest increase in fresh weight in each of five subsequent subcultures as well as maintaining normal morphological features for proliferation. However, the 1.0 mg dm−3 2,4-D treatment in comparison with the lowest, 0.1 mg dm−3, was more beneficial when considering regular increases of fresh weight and a better cell cohesion for callus growth.

Keywords


Nicotiana tabacum; 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid; proliferation; cell divisions; callus morphology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Steward FC, Mapes MO, Mears K. Growth and organised development of cultured cells. Am J Bot. 1958;45:705–708. https://doi.org/10.2307/2439728

Gatz A, Kowalski T. Tracheary element differentiation and morphogenetic changes in callus derived from embryos of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Hortorum Cultus. 2011;10(1):131–146.

Ikeuchi M, Sugimoto K, Iwase A. Plant callus: mechanisms of induction and repression. Plant Cell. 2013;25:3159–3173. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.116053

Miller CO, Skoog F. Chemical control of bud formation in tobacco stem segments. Am J Bot. 1953;40:768–773. https://doi.org/10.2307/2438273

Phillips GC. In vitro morphogenesis in plants – recent advances. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2004;40:342–345. https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2004555

Debergh PC, Read PE. Micropropagation. In: Debergh PC, Zimmerman RH, editors. Micropropagation technology and application. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991. p. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2075-0_1

Rout GR, Mohapatra A, Mohan Jain S. Tissue culture of pot plant: a critical review on present scenario and future prospects. Biotechnol Adv. 2006;24:531–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.05.001

Gamborg OL. Plant tissue culture. Biotechnology, milestones. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. 2002;38:84–92. https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2001281

Filova A. Production of secondary metabolites in plant tissue cultures. Research Journal of Agricultural Science. 2014;46(1):236–245.

Leon J. Rojo E, Sanchez-Serrano JJ. Wound signalling in plants. J Exp Bot. 2001;52(354):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/52.354.1

Savatin DV, Gramegna G, Modesti V, Gervone F. Wounding in the plant tissue: the defence of a dangerous passage. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:470. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00470

Gautheret RJ. Sur la posibilité de réaliser la culture indéfinite des tissu de tuberculec de carotte. C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci. 1939;208:118–121.

Nobecourt P. Sur la perennite et l’augmentation de volume des cultures de tissus vegetaux. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil. 1939;130:1270–1271.

Grembow HJ, Langenbeck-Schwich B. The relationship between oxidase activity, peroxidase activity, hydrogen peroxide and phenolic compounds in the degradation of indole-3-acetic acid in vitro. Planta. 1983;157:131–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00393646

Michalczuk L, Ribinicky DM, Cooke TJ, Cohen JD. Regulation of indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis pathways in carrot cell cultures. Plant Physiol. 1992;100:1346–1353. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.100.3.1346

Hamilton RH, Hurter J, Hall JK, Ercegovich CD. Metabolism of phenoxyacetic acids. Metabolism of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyactic acid and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyactic acid by bean plants. J Agric Food Chem. 1971;19(5):480–483. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60177a052

Grossmann K. Auxin herbicides: current status of mechanism and mode of action. Pest Manag Sci. 2010;66:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1860

Pavlica M, Papes D, Nagy B. 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid causes chromatin and chromosome abnormalities in plant cells and mutation in cultured mammalian cells. Mutation Research Letters. 1991;263(2):77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7992(91)90063-A

Davis DG. 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and indoleacetic acid partially counteract inhibition of organogenesis by difluoromethylornithine. Physiol Plant. 1997;101:425–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb01017.x

Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Plant Physiol. 1962;15:473–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x

Husin MAG, Hasan M, Taha RM. Callus induction from tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaf explants for the production of quinone. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2005;13(5–6):563–572. https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.5500130506

Viana AM, Mantell SH. Comparative uptake and metabolism of 2-[14C]-2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in callus cultures of monocot (Dioscorea spp.) and dicot (Nicotiana tabacum L.) plants. Rev Bras Bot. 1998;21(1):89–99.

Yamada Y, Yasuda T, Koge M, Sekiya J. The interrelationship of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyactic acid with molecular components of the cell during callus induction. Agric Biol Chem. 1971;35:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb1961.35.99

Xu JF, Ying PQ, Han AM, Su ZG. Enhanced salidroside production in liquid-cultivated compact callus aggregates of Rhodiola sachalinensis: manipulation of plant growth regulators and sucrose. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1998;55:53–58. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026489515174

Kirkham MB, Holder PL. Water osmotic and turgor potentials of kinetin-treated callus. HortScience. 1981;16:306–307.

Barciszewski J, Rattan SIS, Siboska G, Clark BFC. Kinetin – 45 years on. Plant Sci. 1999;148:37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00116-8

Barciszewski J, Massino F, Clark BFC. Kinetin – a multiactive molecule. Int J Biol Macromol. 2007;40:182–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2006.06.024

Skoog F, Miller CO. Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured in vitro. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1957;11:118–130.

Fan M, Xu C, Xu K, Hu Y. Lateral organ boundaries transcription factors direct callus formation in Arabidopsis regeneration. Cell Res. 2012;22:1169–1180. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2012.63

Tromas A, Paponov I, Perrot-Rechenmann C. AUXIN BINDING PROTEIN 1: functional and evolutionary aspects. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15:436–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.05.001

Sauer M, Kleine-Vehn J. AUXIN BINDING PROTEIN 1: the outsider. Plant Cell. 2011;23:2033–2043. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.111.087064

Perrot-Rechenmann C. Cellular responses to auxin: division versus expansion. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2(5):a001446. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a001446

Ljung K, Hull AK, Kowalczyk M, Marchant A, Celenza J, Cohen JD, et al. Biosynthesis, conjugation, catabolism and homeostasis of indole-3-acetic acid in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol. 2002;49:249–272. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015298812300

Sen MK, Nasrin S, Rahman S, Jamal AHM. In vitro callus induction and plantlet regeneration of Achyranthes aspera L., a high value medicinal plant. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2014;4(1):40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-1691(14)60206-9

Gautheret RJ. Histogenesis in plant tissue cultures. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1957;19:555–573.

Atta R, Laurens L, Boucheron-Dubuisson E, Guivarch A, Carnero E, Giraudat-Pautot V, et al. Pluripotency of Arabidopsis xylem pericycle underlies shoot regeneration from root and hypocotyl explants grown in vitro. Plant J. 2009;57:626–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03715.x

Lindsey K, Yeoman MM. Dynamic of plant cell culture. In: Vasil IK, editor. Cell culture and somatic cell genetics of plants. Vol. 2. Cell growth, nutrition, cytodifferentiation and cryopreservation. New York, NY: Academic Press Inc.; 1985. p. 61–101.

Enders TA, Strader LC. Auxin activity: past, present, and future. Am J Bot. 2015;10(2):180–196. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.11400285

Cai X, Wang GY, Cao WJ. In vitro induction and proliferation of callus from immature cotyledons and embryos of Juglans regia cv. ‘Xiangling’. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj Napoca. 2013;41(2):378–384.

Iiyama K. Lam TBT, Stone BA. Phenolic acid bridges between polysaccharides and lignin. Phytochemistry. 1990;29:733–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(90)80009-6

Laukkanen H, Rautiainen L, Taulavuori E, Hohtola A. Changes in cellular structures and enzymatic activities during browning of Scots pine callus derived from mature buds. Tree Physiol. 2000;20:467–475. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/20.7.467

Chaudhary G, Dantu PR. Evaluation of callus browning and develop a strategically callus culturing of Boerhaavia diffusa L. Journal of Plant Development. 2015;22(1):47–58.

Purwianingsih W, Febri S, Kusdianti. Formation flavonoid metabolites in callus culture of Chrysanthemum cinerariefolium as alternative provision medicine. AIP Conf Proc. 2016;1708:030005. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4941150

Rodriquez-Serrano M, Pazmiño DM, Sparkes I, Rochetti A, Hawes C, Romero-Puertas MC, et al. 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid promotes S-nitrosylation and oxidation of actin affecting cytoskeleton and peroxisomal dynamics. J Exp Bot. 2014;65(17):4783–4793. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/era237

Yu F, Qian L, Nibau C, Duan Q, Kita D, Levasseur K, et al. FERONIA receptor kinase pathway suppresses abscisic acid signalling in Arabidopsis by activating ABI2 phosphatase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:14693–14698. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212547109




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.1725

Journal ISSN:
  • 2300-357X (online)
  • 0065-0951 (print; ceased since 2016)
This is an Open Access journal, which distributes its content under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, provided that the content is properly cited.
The journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and aims to follow the COPE’s principles.
The journal publisher is a member of the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association.
The journal content is indexed in Similarity Check, the Crossref initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism.
Publisher
Polish Botanical Society